Skip to main content

Sea ice directs changes in bowhead whale phenology through the Bering Strait

Abstract

Background

Climate change is warming the Arctic faster than the rest of the planet. Shifts in whale migration timing have been linked to climate change in temperate and sub-Arctic regions, and evidence suggests Bering–Chukchi–Beaufort (BCB) bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus) might be overwintering in the Canadian Beaufort Sea.

Methods

We used an 11-year timeseries (spanning 2009–2021) of BCB bowhead whale presence in the southern Chukchi Sea (inferred from passive acoustic monitoring) to explore relationships between migration timing and sea ice in the Chukchi and Bering Seas.

Results

Fall southward migration into the Bering Strait was delayed in years with less mean October Chukchi Sea ice area and earlier in years with greater sea ice area (p = 0.04, r2 = 0.40). Greater mean October–December Bering Sea ice area resulted in longer absences between whales migrating south in the fall and north in the spring (p < 0.01, r2 = 0.85). A stepwise shift after 2012–2013 shows some whales are remaining in southern Chukchi Sea rather than moving through the Bering Strait and into the northwestern Bering Sea for the winter. Spring northward migration into the southern Chukchi Sea was earlier in years with less mean January–March Chukchi Sea ice area and delayed in years with greater sea ice area (p < 0.01, r2 = 0.82).

Conclusions

As sea ice continues to decline, northward spring-time migration could shift earlier or more bowhead whales may overwinter at summer feeding grounds. Changes to bowhead whale migration could increase the overlap with ships and impact Indigenous communities that rely on bowhead whales for nutritional and cultural subsistence.

Background

Arctic amplification is changing the climate of the Arctic faster than the global average. Near-surface air temperatures have increased four times faster since 1979 [1] and annual minimum sea ice extent has decreased 13% per decade [2]. Arctic marine mammals, including polar bears (Ursus maritimus), seals, walruses (Odobenus rosmarus), and whales rely on sea ice for a variety of needs, including access to prey and breeding habitat and for predator avoidance. Increased warming and the continued loss of sea ice will negatively impact some of these ice-obligate species [3,4,5,6]. Bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus) are the only baleen whale endemic to the Arctic and rely on phytoplankton blooms tied to annual sea ice melt that feed their zooplankton prey. However, the impacts of a changing Arctic on bowhead whales are less certain than for ice-obligate pinnipeds [3, 5, 7], with some evidence that decreases in sea ice are improving bowhead whale body condition [8].

The distribution and movement of Bering–Chukchi–Beaufort (BCB) bowhead whales in the western Arctic has been established from multiple lines of evidence, including aerial surveys, satellite tagging, passive acoustic monitoring (PAM), and Indigenous knowledge [9,10,11,12,13]. After spending winter in the northwestern Bering Sea, BCB bowhead whales migrate north from April to May through the Bering Strait and into the Chukchi and western Beaufort Seas and then eastward from May to June to the Canadian Beaufort Sea, where they spend the summer feeding. From August to October, they migrate westward toward the Chukotka Peninsula, Russia, before moving south through the Bering Strait, and back into the northwestern Bering Sea for the winter.

Bowhead whale movement is strongly associated with the spatiotemporal availability of prey and distribution of sea ice [14,15,16,17]. However, Traditional Knowledge suggests that an increased open water season has shifted the timing of the bowhead spring migration by one month [11, 18, 19]. Additionally, an unknown number of BCB bowhead whales were acoustically documented for the first time spending the entire 2018–2019 winter at what is normally their summer foraging grounds in the Amundsen Gulf and eastern Beaufort Sea [20].

Changes to bowhead whale migration could alter breeding phenology, increase their overlap with human use areas, especially as the Northern Sea Route, Northwest Passage and Transpolar Routes are used increasingly as Pacific-Atlantic shipping routes [21, 22], and impact the ecosystem where they play an important role as a predator [23]. Bowhead whales are one of the most important subsistence species for Native Alaskan and Canadian communities in the Bering, Chukchi, and Beaufort Seas. Thus, changes to the Arctic climate will also affect the people living in the Arctic.

Because of the remoteness and extreme environmental conditions of the Arctic, studying bowhead whale migration over long time periods can be challenging. PAM is non-invasive, allows for long-term, year-round studies of free-ranging whales traveling through or under ice across large geographic ranges, and is a powerful tool for studies of animals that reliably produce sound. From late October to early May, encompassing fall/spring migration through the Bering Strait, bowhead whales produce call sequences repeated as song [24]. Songs can last for hours and are thought to be produced by males as a reproductive strategy [24,25,26]. During the summer and fall, bowhead whales also produce simple, low frequency (25–1000 Hz) sounds unrelated to song. The sounds are likely used to maintain contact among migrating animals [27], navigate through and under the ice [28, 29], and/or socialize [30]. Because bowhead whales call year-round and the calls are relatively low frequency, they can be detected reliably on hydrophones. The acoustic detections of bowhead vocalizations can be used as an indicator for animal presence, from which migration behavior can be inferred.

Here we use a long-term PAM dataset spanning 2009–2021 to investigate BCB bowhead whale migration through the Bering Strait. Specifically, we examined: (1) the effect of sea ice metrics (i.e., environmental effects) on the timing of the southward migration in the fall from the southern Chukchi Sea through the Bering Strait (hereafter “southward passage”), movement from the Bering Strait into the northwestern Bering Sea in the winter, and northward migration in the spring through the Bering Strait into the southern Chukchi Sea (hereafter “northward passage”); and (2) the temporal trend (i.e., temporal effects) in the timing of the fall southward passage, movement from the Bering Strait to the northwestern Bering Sea in the winter, and northward passage in the spring. We hypothesize that sea ice in the Chukchi Sea is the driving force behind whales migrating through the Bering Strait in the fall and spring and that sea ice in the Bering Strait is the force behind bowhead whales moving out of the Bering Strait and into to the lower latitude Bering Sea/Bering Shelf for the winter.

Methods

Data collection and preparation

Passive acoustic data were collected by AURAL-M2 (Autonomous Underwater Recorder for Acoustic Listening-Model 2, Multi-Électronique, Inc.) recording packages, which were deployed on moorings (Fig. 1A, Table 1) in the southern Chukchi Sea at the Chukchi Sea/Bering Strait boundary (~ 66.33° N, 168.95° W; Fig. 1B, [31]). The hydrophones sampled at 8192 Hz or 16,384 Hz on duty cycles ranging from 10 to 25 min every hour. The sampling schedule is a trade-off between recording bandwidth, hard drive capacity, and battery pack duration; however, the sample rates are sufficient to capture the entire bandwidth of bowhead whale vocalizations. Each month of acoustic data was converted to a long-term spectral average (LTSA) using Triton software (v 1.93, [32]) in MATLAB (v 2022a, [33]). The LTSAs were averaged across 5 s at 1 Hz resolution.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Map of mooring deployment location (~ 66.33° N, 168.5° W; red circle) at the boundary between the Chukchi Sea and the Bering Strait with 30-km detection radius. Black box on inset indicates site within broader global region (i.e., centered between Russia and Alaska). Map made in R [34] with the “ggOceanMaps” (v 1.0.9, [35]) and “ggspatial” (v 1.1.7, [36]) packages

Table 1 Deployment information for 11 migratory seasons (October–May) spanning 2009–2021 including season, sampling rate (Hz), duty cycle (min/h), deployment date (mm/dd/yy format), recovery date, data recording start, data recording end, total acoustic data per deployment (h), water depth (m), and recorder depth (m)

Daily north regional sea ice data for the Bering and Chukchi Seas were extracted from the sea ice index analysis spreadsheets, which are derived from Sea Ice Index V3 [37]. We chose to examine sea ice area (km2) as opposed to sea ice extent (km) because even though they are similar, sea ice area is a more quantitative way of describing sea-ice coverage. Sea ice extent is calculated by the number of grid cells in a region with 15% or more sea ice, whereas sea ice area is the total region covered by ice. Because bowhead whales can feed along the sea ice edge and can break through sea ice up to 0.5 m thick with their heads [29], we wanted to use a sea ice metric that would impose greater restrictions on their movement. And although summertime values of sea ice area taken from satellite sensors can be less reliable due to the fact that surface melt appears as open water, we only included sea ice area from October–May, which encompasses the full residence time of bowhead whales migrating south in the fall and north in the spring through the Bering Strait.

Bowhead whale detection

Monthly LTSAs spanning October–May were manually visually assessed in Triton for the presence of bowhead whale song and non-song calls (Fig. 2). For each month, an initial 12-h LTSA was scanned. The spectrograms were viewed with a 2048 or 4096 sample FFT, 75% overlap, and Hanning window. The presence of bowhead whale song is typically obvious in a 12-h window (e.g., Fig. 2A). If calls were faint or short, especially for non-song related calls (e.g., Fig. 2C) or to discriminate among overlapping baleen whale species in early fall (e.g., humpback vs bowhead whales), specific hours of interest were assessed at 90 s intervals. Bowhead whale hourly presence was documented for 11 migratory seasons (October–May, which encompass the southward and northern migration of bowhead whales) spanning 2009–2021, excluding 2016 where there were no data available. Hourly acoustic presence was converted to daily and weekly presence by summing number of call hours. To standardize the number of calls by effort, the daily number of call hours were standardized by the proportion of daily effort. In shallow water, similar to that found in the Bering Strait region, most bowhead simple calls should be detectable out to ~ 20 km with the possibility of some signals detectable to a maximum distance of 30 km [38,39,40].

Fig. 2
figure 2

A Long-term spectral average (LTSA) with 12 h of acoustic data 22 January 2011. Black dashed lines indicate zoomed-in spectral slice. B Zoomed-in spectrogram from LTSA with 90 s of acoustic data depicting bout of bowhead whale song. C LTSA with 12 h of calling 9 February 2020. Black dashed lines indicate zoomed-in spectral slice. D Zoomed-in spectrogram from LTSA with 90 s of acoustic data depicting non-song vocalizations of bowhead whales. LTSAs plotted with Triton software (v 1.93, [32]) in MATLAB (v 2022a, [33]) (4096 sample FFT, 75% overlap, Hanning window)

Migration timing metrics

Some migratory seasons did not have full data coverage (Table 1); therefore, we could not estimate migration dates based on percentiles around the seasonal distribution of call hours. The onset of the southward passage was defined as the first day with more than 15% of call hours (i.e., day with more than three hours with calls). The cessation of northern migration passage was defined as the last day with more than 15% of call hours. For both southward and northward passage, we explored the first day with any call hours, and 5%, 10%, 20%, and 25% call hours; however, the dates were similar (Additional file 1: Tables S1–S2) and very highly correlated (all p ≥ 0.95). We used linear models to assess long-term trends in southward and northward passage dates with the base “stats” package in R (v 4.2.1, [34]). To assess linear relationships between southward and northward passages and sea ice, we tested a number of Chukchi Sea ice area (km2) metrics spanning October–May, including monthly values, combinations of months, minimums, and maximums, etc., many of which were significant (Additional file 1: Table S3) and cross-correlated (Additional file 1: Tables S4–S5). We then chose values that balanced level of significance with biological relevance. Significance was set at 0.10 in order to minimize the probability of Type II errors in studies with limited sample sizes [41].

Bowhead acoustic absence between southward and northward passage

Biologging tag data suggest that bowhead whales migrate through Bering Strait and into the lower latitude Bering Sea for the winter, notably the Anadyr Strait area in the western Bering Sea [13, 42, 43]. To test whether whales were spending more time in the Chukchi Sea and northern Bering Strait than in the northwestern Bering Sea, we quantified the absence between the southward and northward passage into the Bering Strait. We defined this absence as the maximum number of continuous days with less than 15% of call hours (i.e., ≤ 3 h with calls per day). We also explored the number of continuous days with 0 calls and with less than 5% of hours with calls (i.e., < 2 h with calls per day), however, the absences were similar (Additional file 1: Table S6) and highly correlated (all p ≥ 0.99). We used linear models to assess the longitudinal trends in number of consecutive gap days with the base “stats” package in R (v 4.2.1, [34]). To assess linear relationships between number of consecutive gap days and sea ice, we used a number of Bering Sea ice area (km2) metrics spanning October–May, including monthly values, combinations of months, minimums, and maximums, etc., many of which were significant (Additional file 1: Table S7) and highly cross-correlated (Additional file 1: Table S8). We chose values that balanced level of significance with biological relevance.

Results

Bowhead whale calling

Between 2009 and 2021 roughly 22,235 h of bowhead song presence were documented as well as 4669 h of simple song and social/non-song call presence. Because we were interested in the acoustic presence of bowhead whales, if song was detected, we did not then search for calls in the same file. Bowhead whales were predominantly acoustically present from autumn throughout the spring months (November to mid-May) north of Bering Strait in the southern Chukchi Sea. The earliest bowhead whales were detected was 31 October (12 h of non-song presence in 2013) and the latest bowhead whales were detected was 15 May (3 call hours of song and 1 call hour of non-song presence in 2012). Peak months for bowhead whale acoustic presence were December and January, each of which had a daily median of 24 call hours.

Migration timing and sea ice

The southward passage in the fall from the southern Chukchi Sea through the Bering Strait was positively linearly related (p = 0.04, r2 = 0.40) to mean sea ice area in the Chukchi Sea in October (Fig. 3). Southward passage was delayed in migratory seasons (October–May) with smaller mean sea ice area in the Chukchi Sea in October and earlier in migratory seasons with larger mean sea ice area in the Chukchi Sea in October. There was a 22-day difference in the earliest southward passage and the latest southward passage (Fig. 3). The earliest southward passage (31 October) of bowhead whales from the southern Chukchi Sea and through the Bering Strait occurred during the 2013–2014 season, which was the migratory season with the greatest mean sea ice area in the Chukchi Sea in October (273,984 km2). The latest southward passage (22 November) occurred during the 2018–2019 season, which was the migratory season with the third smallest mean sea ice area in the Chukchi Sea in October (70,592 km2).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Linear regression (p = 0.04, r2 = 0.40; y = − 5.11^10–5 x + 324) between date of bowhead whale fall southward passage (i.e., first day with > 3 h with calls) through the Bering Strait and mean sea ice area in the Chukchi Sea in October for 11 migratory seasons (October–May) spanning 2009–2021

The maximum number of consecutive days that whales were acoustically absent between the southward and northward passage was positively linearly related to the mean sea ice area in October-December in the Bering Sea (p < 0.01, r2 = 0.85) (Fig. 4). Migratory seasons with greater sea ice area resulted in larger absences between whales migrating south in the fall through the Bering Strait and north in the spring. Migratory seasons with less sea ice area resulted in shorter and in some migratory seasons, no absences between whales migrating south in the fall through the Bering Strait and north in the spring. The maximum number of consecutive absences in 2011–2012 (55 days) and in 2012–2013 (48 days) coincided with the top two greatest mean sea ice areas in October-December in the Bering Sea (82,092 km2 and 97,656 km2, respectively). The maximum number of consecutive absences in 2014–2015 (3 days) and in 2019–2020 (4 days) coincided with the second and fourth smallest mean sea ice areas in October-December in the Bering Sea (28,626 km2 and 26,576 km2, respectively).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Linear regression (p < 0.01, r2 = 0.85; y = 6.26^10–4 x − 8.29) between the maximum number of consecutive days (~ January–March) with ≤ 3 h with calls per day in the Bering Strait (i.e., absences between southward and northward passage) and mean sea ice area in the Bering Sea in October–December for 9 migratory seasons spanning 2011–2021

The northward passage in the spring into the southern Chukchi Sea was positively linearly related (p < 0.01, r2 = 0.82) to mean sea ice area in the Chukchi Sea in January–March (Fig. 5). Spring-time northward passage was earlier in migratory seasons with less sea ice area in the Chukchi Sea in January–March and delayed in migratory seasons with greater sea ice area in the Chukchi Sea in during these months. There was a 23-day difference in the earliest northward passage and the latest northward passage. The earliest northward passage (23 April) of bowhead whales through the Bering Strait and into the southern Chukchi Seas occurred during the 2017–2018 season (Fig. 5). This coincided with the migratory season with the smallest mean sea ice area in the Chukchi Sea across our study period in January–March (775,360 km2) and the smallest November sea ice extent on record. The latest northward passage (May 15) occurred during the 2011–2012 season, which coincided with the migratory season with the greatest mean sea ice area in the Chukchi Sea in January–March (819,087 km2).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Linear regression (p < 0.01, r2 = 0.82; y = 4.86^10–4 x – 260) between date of bowhead whale spring northward passage (i.e., last day with > 3 h with calls) through the Bering Strait and mean sea ice area in the Chukchi Sea in January–March for 8 migratory seasons spanning 2011–2021

Temporal trends

The onset of the southward passage from the southern Chukchi Sea and into the Bering Strait was assessed across 11 migratory seasons between 2009 and 2021, excluding the 2016–2017 season, for which there were no data. Southward passage Julian days (JD) ranged from JD 304 to JD 326 with a median of 318 (95% CI 307–324) (Fig. 3, Table 2). There was no long-term linear trend in the timing of the southward passage from 2009 to 2021 (p = 0.43, r2 = 0.07). All but two southward passages happened in mid-November between JD 314 and JD 326, a 13-day window. Two early southward passages occurred in the 2012–2013 (JD 309) and 2013–2014 (JD 304) seasons.

Table 2 Call metrics for 11 migratory seasons spanning 2009–2021 including arrival Julian day, departure Julian day, and maximum number of consecutive days with gaps between the southward and northward passage

The duration of absences from the southern Chukchi Sea between whales migrating south in the fall and north in the spring were assessed across 9 migratory seasons, excluding the 2009–2010, 2010–2011, and 2016–2017 seasons, for which there were no, or incomplete, data. Absences ranged from 3 to 55 consecutive days spanning January–March, with a median of 13 days (95% CI 3–52 days) (Fig. 6, Table 2). Although there was a negatively significant linear trend (p = 0.025, r2 = 0.54) in the gaps from 2011 to 2021, exponential decay (pseudo r2 = 0.85) was a better fit, driven by the steep decline or stepwise shift in number of consecutive days with ≤ 3 h with calls after the 2011–2012 and 2012–2013 seasons (Fig. 7). The 2014–2015, 2017–2018, and 2018–2019 seasons had only three consecutive days with zero call hours and the 2019–2020 season had only two consecutive days with zero call hours.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Total weekly call hours of vocalizing bowhead whales from October through May for 11 migratory seasons spanning 2009–2021. Gray bars indicate periods with no acoustic data. Asterisks indicate proportion of weekly effort (secondary y-axis) from the duty cycled data. Most migratory seasons had nearly 100% effort with the exception of 2018–2019. Annual weekly call hour histogram plot made in R [34] with the “ggplot2” package (v 3.3.6, [44]

Fig. 7
figure 7

Exponential decay (pseudo r2 = 0.85) in absences (i.e., max consecutive days with ≤ 3 h with calls) between whales migrating south in the fall and north in the spring across 9 migratory seasons, driven by the steep decline or stepwise shift (dashed grey lines) after the 2011–2012 and 2012–2013 seasons

The timing of the northward passages through the Bering Strait and into the southern Chukchi Sea was assessed across 8 migratory seasons between 2009 and 2021, excluding the 2009–2010, 2010–2011, 2016–2017, and 2018–2019 seasons, where there were no or incomplete data. Northward passage JDs ranged from 113 to 136 with a median of 129 (95% CI 113–134) (Fig. 3, Table 2). There was no long-term linear trend in the timing of the northward passage (p = 0.67, r2 = 0.03). Most northward passages happened early May, between JD 128 and JD 136, a 9-day window. Two outlier early northward passages occurred in 2013–2014 (JD 114) and 2017–2018 (JD 113).

Discussion

The role of sea ice in driving migration timing

We found that both annual southward and northward passages between the southern Chukchi Sea and the Bering Strait were driven by Chukchi Sea ice conditions, while the absence of whales between the southward and northward passages was driven by sea ice in the Bering Sea. This suggests that bowhead whales are forced south into the Bering Strait by Chukchi Sea ice and then moved further south into the Bering Sea by increasing sea ice. The relationship between bowhead whale movement and sea ice is well known [15, 45]. However, our findings highlight the importance of ice on migration timing and patterns, which may be altered drastically by climate change.

While 2018–2019 was a migratory season in our study without good effort coverage (i.e., effort was below 25% for a majority of acoustic files spanning October to May due to instrument issues), sea ice area January–March in the Chukchi Sea in 2018–2019 was close to that of 2017–2018 (782,334 km2 and 775,360 km2, respectively), which was the migratory season with the earliest end of northern migration (23 April). The linear model predicted a cessation of northward passage as early as 25 April in 2018, providing further evidence of earlier migration north through the Bering Strait and into the southern Chukchi Sea when sea ice is reduced. That same winter, acoustic evidence indicated that some bowhead whales overwintered in Amundsen Gulf and the eastern Beaufort Sea [20]. As sea ice continues to decline, more bowhead whales may overwinter on their feeding grounds.

Although our findings suggest that movement into the Bering Strait and Bering Sea is driven by sea ice, with less sea ice there will be less pressure for whales to migrate as far south in the winter. Tagging studies show that while many bowhead whales migrate to the Bering Sea for the winter, some have remained in the Chukchi Sea and Bering Strait [13, 43, 46]. Additionally, a small number of bowhead whales (~ 500) was documented spending the 2000 and 2001 summers in the Chukchi Sea [47], suggesting flexibility in habitat and diet.

Bowhead whale movement throughout the Arctic is driven by the seasonality of prey hotspots that occur throughout their range [46], similar to other whales whose migration tracks resource waves [48]. Delaying or forgoing winter migration may provide access to more nutrient rich prey, reduce competition from conspecifics or sub-arctic baleen whales, and/or reduce the potential for increased predation pressure from killer whales [49, 50]. However, it is unclear how or if changes to primary and secondary productivity and length of the growing season [51] will outweigh any potential negative impacts from changes in upwelling-favorable winds and zooplankton transport on prey availability [52, 53] and bowhead whale habitat [54, 55].

Temporal trends

Shifts in whale migration timing have been linked to climate change in temperate and sub-Arctic regions. Fin (Balaenoptera physalus) and humpback (Megaptera novaeangliae) whales arrived one month earlier in the Gulf of St. Lawrence over a 27-year period [56]; humpback and blue whales (Balaenoptera musculus) arrived 120 and 100 days earlier, respectively, in the Gulf of the Farallones over a 24-year period [57]; and blue whales arrived one month earlier to Southern California across a 10-year period [58]. Some Arctic species are also beginning to display migration changes due to climate change. For example, tagged beluga whales (Delphinapterus leucas) delayed departure from Beaufort Sea feeding areas in 2004–2012 compared to 1993–2002, coincident with delayed regional sea ice freeze-up in the Beaufort, Chukchi, and Bering Seas [59].

Druckenmiller et al. [55] did not anticipate large changes in the timing of BCB bowhead whale spring migration, though they did predict bowhead whales would spend more time in summer and fall feeding areas, delaying their arrival to wintering areas in the Bering Sea. The cessation of the northward (spring) passages from our study all occurred within a ~ 9-day window across 8 migratory seasons, supporting this hypothesis. However, 8 migratory seasons may not be long enough to identify any significant long-term changes. Additionally, our northward passage metric indicates cessation rather than onset of northern migration, which we were not able to examine with our data.

The onset of the southward (fall) passage from our study occurred within a ~ 2-week window across 11 migratory seasons. The median southward passage (14 November) was not different from averages from tagged bowhead whales in 2008 and 2009 (15 and 26 November, respectively) [42]. However, from 2017 to 2021, the Aleutian Low shifted into the western Bering Sea and the jet stream meandered poleward, supporting southerly winds and reducing ice growth [60]. After 2017, bowhead whale southward passages through the Bering Strait were later than average, suggesting whales may be just starting to delay their arrival to wintering areas in the northwestern Bering Sea. Supporting evidence for this includes bowhead whale fall migration in the western Beaufort Sea occurred consistently later per season from 2008 to 2018, and that timing was influenced by the winter of 2016–2017 during which bowhead whales remained in the Beaufort Sea into mid-January of 2017 [61]. Additionally, bowhead whales were seen and heard in the Canadian Beaufort in the winter of 2018–2019 [20].

Although there was no long-term trend in annual southward or northward passage through the Bering Strait, there was a stepwise shift (i.e., decline) in whale absence from the southern Chukchi Sea during the southward and northward passage across 9 migratory seasons. Chambault et al. [62] predicted northward shifts in Eastern Arctic bowhead whale distribution to cope with climate change. The reduced absence between southward and northern migration through the Bering Strait from our findings supports this, and suggests BCB bowhead whales are shifting northward, potentially overwintering in the southern Chukchi Sea. The first migratory season with no mid-winter gap in acoustic detections coincided with the 2017 Arctic regime shift [60], after which there were very few consecutive days where bowhead whales were absent from the southern Chukchi Sea in the winter of 2018–2019. Taken together, there is an increasing body of evidence that the migration phenology of BCB bowhead whale is changing.

Future threats for humans and whales

One of the biggest questions is how changes to migration patterns and timing will impact those who rely on bowhead whales for nutritional and cultural subsistence. In response to regional changes over the last 30 years, Yup’ik whalers in the northern Bering Sea have extended their harvest into late fall and winter months [11, 63]. In 2019, Iñupiat whalers in Utqiaġvik, Alaska had not sighted one single bowhead by September and only landed one whale mid-November [64]. Aerial surveys found that the whales had remained unusually far offshore the fall that year [65]. Changes in the timing and distribution of bowhead whales can negatively impact nutritional and cultural subsistence for northern peoples. Thus, predicting future changes to bowhead whale movement and migration timing is of highest priority to local stakeholders.

Continued sea ice decline may increase the overlap of whales with ships, exposure to ship noise, and increase overlap with fisheries and therefore increase entanglement risk. With decreased sea ice, the Northern Sea Route and Northwest Passage are becoming viable Pacific-Atlantic shipping routes where increased vessel traffic will pass through Bering Strait [66]. Increased vessel traffic is likely to increase ship strike injury and death [21, 67]. Modeled bowhead whale habitat use from 2015 to 2017 tag data suggested that they experienced the highest number of underwater noise events and greatest overlap with ship traffic September–October in the southern Chukchi Sea [68], where whales may be spending more time or overwintering in the future. While commercial fishing is currently banned in the high Arctic [69], the Russian Federation has recently started a commercial pollock fishery in the western Chukchi Sea and fisheries research in the region suggests that large biomass of snow crab (Chionoecetes opilio) exists in the region [70]. The most recent information on entanglement rates for BCB bowheads, which are over a decade old, suggest that overall, roughly 12% of whales show evidence of entanglement while 50% of large (older) whales show some evidence of entanglement [49, 71]. Should pot and line fisheries move into the southern Chukchi Sea, the potential exists for increases in fishing gear entanglements as has been seen in the northern Bering Sea [72].

Conclusions

We used a dataset spanning 2009–2021 to examine the long-term trends in the fall southward migration from the southern Chukchi Sea through the Bering Strait, movement from the Bering Strait to the northwestern Bering Sea in the winter, and the spring northward migration through the Bering Strait into the southern Chukchi Sea. The major climate regime shift in 2017 may have driven the apparent step change in the migration patterns and timing of BCB bowhead whales. We hope to use the relationship we found with sea ice to predict future migration timing and compare migration timing at other sites in the western Arctic. Finally, we only looked at presence/absence in terms of number of hours per day with calling, but we do not yet know how many whales were present in the winter in the southern Chukchi Sea and northern Bering Strait. Future visual surveys or satellite images may help quantify the number of whales overwintering in the southern Chukchi Sea.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available in the Arctic Data Center, arcticdata.io.

Abbreviations

BCB:

Bering-Chukchi-Beaufort

LTSA:

Long-term spectral average

PAM:

Passive acoustic monitoring

References

  1. Rantanen M, Karpechko AY, Lipponen A, Nordling K, Hyvärinen O, Ruosteenoja K, et al. The Arctic has warmed nearly four times faster than the globe since 1979. Commun Earth Environ. 2022;3:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Druckenmiller ML, Moon TA, Thoman RL, Ballinger TJ, Berner LT, Bernhard GH, et al. The Arctic. Bull Am Meteorol Soc. 2021;102:S263–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Laidre KL, Stirling I, Lowry LF, Wiig Ø, Heide-Jørgensen MP, Ferguson SH. Quantifying the sensitivity of arctic marine mammals to climate-induced habitat change. Ecol Appl. 2008;18:S97-125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kovacs KM, Lydersen C. Climate change impacts on seals and whales in the North Atlantic Arctic and adjacent shelf seas. Sci Progress. 2008;91:117–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Moore SE, Reeves RR. Tracking arctic marine mammal resilience in an era of rapid ecosystem alteration. PLoS Biol. 2018;16:e2006708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Boveng PL, Ziel HL, McClintock BT, Cameron MF. Body condition of phocid seals during a period of rapid environmental change in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands, Alaska. Deep Sea Res Part II. 2020;181–182:104904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Moore SE, Laidre KL. Trends in sea ice cover within habitats used by bowhead whales in the western Arctic. Ecol Appl. 2006;16:932–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. George JC, Druckenmiller ML, Laidre KL, Suydam R, Person B. Bowhead whale body condition and links to summer sea ice and upwelling in the Beaufort Sea. Prog Oceanogr. 2015;136:250–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Braham HW, Fraker MA, Krogman BD. Spring migration of the western Arctic population of bowhead whales. Mar Fish Rev. 1980;42:36–46.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Moore SE, Clarke JT, Ljungblad DK. Bowhead whale (Balaena mysticetus) spatial and temporal distribution in the central Beaufort Sea during late summer and early fall 1979–86. Int Whal Comm. 1989;39:283–90.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Noongwook G, The Native Village of Savoonga, The Native Village of Gambell, Huntington HP, George JC. Traditional knowledge of the bowhead whale (Balaena mysticetus) around St. Lawrence Island, Alaska. Arctic. 2007;60:47–54.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Clarke JT, Brower AA, Christman CL, Ferguson MC, Kennedy AS, Willoughby AL. Distribution and relative abundance of marine mammals in the Northeastern Chukchi and Western Beaufort Seas, 2014. Seattle: National Marine Mammal Laboratory, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, NMFS, NOAA,; 2015 p. 411. Report No.: OCS Study BOEM 2015-040.

  13. Citta JJ, Quakenbush L, George JC. Distribution and behavior of Bering–Chukchi–Beaufort bowhead whales as inferred by telemetry. The bowhead whale. New York: Elsevier; 2021. p. 31–56.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Citta JJ, Olnes J, Okkonen SR, Quakenbush L, George JC, Maslowski W, et al. Influence of oceanography on bowhead whale (Balaena mysticetus) foraging in the Chukchi Sea as inferred from animal-borne instrumentation. Cont Shelf Res. 2021;224:104434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ferguson SH, Dueck L, Loseto LL, Luque SP. Bowhead whale Balaena mysticetus seasonal selection of sea ice. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2010;411:285–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kovacs KM, Lydersen C, Vacquiè-Garcia J, Shpak O, Glazov D, Heide-Jørgensen MP. The endangered Spitsbergen bowhead whales’ secrets revealed after hundreds of years in hiding. Biol Lett. 2020;16:20200148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Heide-Jørgensen MP, Hansen RG, Shpak OV. Distribution, migrations, and ecology of the Atlantic and the Okhotsk Sea populations. The Bowhead Whale. New York: Elsevier; 2021. p. 57–75.

    Google Scholar 

  18. George JC, Givens GH, Suydam R, Herreman J, Mocklin J, Tudor B, et al. Summary of the spring 2011 ice-based visual, acoustic, and aerial photo-identification survey of bowhead whales conducted near Point Barrow, Alaska. International Whaling Commission; 2011 p. 25. Report No.: Paper SC/65a/BRG11. iwc.int.

  19. Huntington HP, Sakakibara C, Noongwook G, Kanayurak N, Skhauge V, Zdor E, et al. Whale hunting in Indigenous Arctic cultures. The bowhead whale. New York: Elsevier; 2021. p. 501–17.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Insley SJ, Halliday WD, Mouy X, Diogou N. Bowhead whales overwinter in the Amundsen Gulf and Eastern Beaufort Sea. Royal society open science. London: Royal Society Publishing; 2021. p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hauser DDW, Laidre KL, Stern HL. Vulnerability of Arctic marine mammals to vessel traffic in the increasingly ice-free Northwest Passage and Northern Sea Route. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2018;115:7617–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Huntington HP, Daniel R, Hartsig A, Harun K, Heiman M, Meehan R, et al. Vessels, risks, and rules: planning for safe shipping in Bering Strait. Mar Policy. 2015;51:119–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Laidre K, Heide-Jørgensen M, Nielsen T. Role of the bowhead whale as a predator in West Greenland. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2007;346:285–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Delarue J, Laurinolli M, Martin B. Bowhead whale (Balaena mysticetus) songs in the Chukchi Sea between October 2007 and May 2008. J Acoust Soc Am. 2009;126:3319–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Johnson HD, Stafford KM, George JC, Ambrose WG Jr, Clark CW. Song sharing and diversity in the Bering–Chukchi–Beaufort population of bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus), spring 2011. Mar Mamm Sci. 2015;31:902–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Stafford KM, Castellote M, Guerra M, Berchok CL. Seasonal acoustic environments of beluga and bowhead whale core-use regions in the Pacific Arctic. Deep Sea Res Part II. 2018;152:108–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Clark CW. Call tracks of bowhead whales based on call characteristics as an independent means of determining tracking parameters. Rep Int Whal Comm. 1989;39:111–2.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ellison WT, Clark CW, Bishop GC. Potential use of surface reverberation by bowhead whales, Balaena mysticetus, in under-ice navigation: preliminary considerations. Rep Int Whal Comm. 1987;37:329–32.

    Google Scholar 

  29. George JC, Clark C, Carroll GM, Ellison WT. Observations on the ice-breaking and ice navigation behavior of migrating bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus) near Point Barrow, Alaska, Spring 1985. Arctic. 1989;42:24–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Würsig B, Clark C. Behavior. The bowhead whale. Lawrence: Society for Marine Mammal Mammalogy; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Woodgate RA, Peralta-Ferriz C. Warming and freshening of the Pacific inflow to the Arctic from 1990–2019 implying dramatic shoaling in Pacific winter water ventilation of the Arctic water column. Geophys Res Lett. 2021;48:e2021GL092528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wiggins SM, Roch MA, Hildebrand JA. TRITON software package: analyzing large passive acoustic monitoring data sets using MATLAB. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010;128:2299–2299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. MATLAB. Version 9.12.0.2009381 (R2022a). Natick: The MathWorks Inc.; 2010.

  34. R Core Team. Version 4.2.2. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; 2022. https://www.R-project.org/.

  35. Vihtakari M. ggOceanMaps: plot data on oceanographic maps using “ggplot2”; 2021. https://mikkovihtakari.github.io/ggOceanMaps/.

  36. Dunnington D. ggspatial: spatial data framework for ggplot2; 2022. https://paleolimbot.github.io/ggspatial/articles/ggspatial.html.

  37. Fetterer F, Knowles K, Meier WN, Savoie M, Windnagel AK. Sea ice index, version 3 [data set]. Boulder: National Snow and Ice Data Center; 2007. https://doi.org/10.7265/N5K072F8.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  38. Charif RA, Rahaman A, Muirhead CA, Pitzrick MS, Warde AM, Hall J, et al. Bowhead whale acoustic activity in the southeast Beaufort Sea during late summer 2008–2010. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013;134:4323–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Abadi SH, Thode AM, Blackwell SB, Dowling DR. Ranging bowhead whale calls in a shallow-water dispersive waveguide. J Acoust Soc Am. 2014;136:130–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Bonnel J, Thode AM, Blackwell SB, Kim K, Michael Macrander A. Range estimation of bowhead whale (Balaena mysticetus) calls in the Arctic using a single hydrophone. J Acoust Soc Am. 2014;136:145–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Amrhein V, Greenland S, McShane B. Scientists rise up against statistical significance. Nature. 2019;567:305–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Citta JJ, Quakenbush LT, George JC, Small RJ, Heide-Jørgensen MP, Brower H, et al. Winter movements of bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus) in the Bering Sea. Arctic. 2012;65:13–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Citta JJ, Lowry LF, Quakenbush LT, Kelly BP, Fischbach AS, London JM, et al. A multi-species synthesis of satellite telemetry data in the Pacific Arctic (1987–2015): overlap of marine mammal distributions and core use areas. Deep Sea Res Part II. 2018;152:132–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wickham H. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer; 2016.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  45. Moore SE, Reeves RR. Distribution and movement. The bowhead whale. Lawrence: Society for Marine Mammal Mammalogy; 1993. p. 313–86.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Citta JJ, Quakenbush LT, Okkonen SR, Druckenmiller ML, Maslowski W, Clement-Kinney J, et al. Ecological characteristics of core-use areas used by Bering–Chukchi–Beaufort (BCB) bowhead whales, 2006–2012. Prog Oceanogr. 2015;136:201–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Melnikov VV, Zeh JE. Chukotka Peninsula counts and estimates of the number of migrating bowhead whales. J Cetac Res Manag. 2007;9:29–35.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Abrahms B, Hazen EL, Aikens EO, Savoca MS, Goldbogen JA, Bograd SJ, et al. Memory and resource tracking drive blue whale migrations. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2019. https://doi.org/10.5441/001/1.5ph88fk2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. George JC, Sheffield G, Reed DJ, Tudor B, Stimmelmayr R, Person BT, et al. Frequency of injuries from line entanglements, killer whales, and ship strikes on Bering–Chukchi–Beaufort Seas bowhead whales. Arctic. 2017;70:37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Moore SE, George JC, Reeves RR. Bowhead whale ecology in changing high-latitude ecosystems. The bowhead whale. New York: Elsevier; 2021. p. 417–27.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Arrigo KR, van Dijken GL. Continued increases in Arctic Ocean primary production. Prog Oceanogr. 2015;136:60–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Pickart RS, Schulze LM, Moore GWK, Charette MA, Arrigo KR, van Dijken G, et al. Long-term trends of upwelling and impacts on primary productivity in the Alaskan Beaufort Sea. Deep Sea Res Part I. 2013;79:106–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Ershova E, Hopcroft R, Kosobokova K, Matsuno K, Nelson RJ, Yamaguchi A, et al. Long-term changes in summer zooplankton communities of the western Chukchi Sea, 1945–2012. Oceanog. 2015;28:100–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Moore SE, Stabeno PJ. Synthesis of Arctic Research (SOAR) in marine ecosystems of the Pacific Arctic. Prog Oceanogr. 2015;136:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Druckenmiller ML, Citta JJ, Ferguson MC, Clarke JT, George JC, Quakenbush L. Trends in sea-ice cover within bowhead whale habitats in the Pacific Arctic. Deep Sea Res Part II. 2018;152:95–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Ramp C, Delarue J, Palsbøll PJ, Sears R, Hammond PS. Adapting to a warmer ocean—seasonal shift of baleen whale movements over three decades. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0121374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Ingman K, Hines E, Mazzini PLF, Rockwood RC, Nur N, Jahncke J. Modeling changes in baleen whale seasonal abundance, timing of migration, and environmental variables to explain the sudden rise in entanglements in California. PLoS ONE. 2021;16:e0248557.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Szesciorka AR, Ballance LT, Širović A, Rice A, Ohman MD, Hildebrand JA, et al. Timing is everything: drivers of interannual variability in blue whale migration. Sci Rep. 2020;10:7710.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Hauser DDW, Laidre KL, Stafford KM, Stern HL, Suydam RS, Richard PR. Decadal shifts in autumn migration timing by Pacific Arctic beluga whales are related to delayed annual sea ice formation. Glob Change Biol. 2017;23:2206–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Ballinger TJ, Overland JE. The Alaskan Arctic regime shift since 2017: a harbinger of years to come? Polar Sci. 2022;32:100841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Stafford KM, Citta JJ, Okkonen SR, Zhang J. Bowhead and beluga whale acoustic detections in the western Beaufort Sea 2008–2018. PLoS ONE. 2021;16:e0253929.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Chambault P, Kovacs KM, Lydersen C, Shpak O, Teilmann J, Albertsen CM, et al. Future seasonal changes in habitat for Arctic whales during predicted ocean warming. Sci Adv. 2022;8:eabn2422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Suydam R, George JC. Current indigenous whaling. The bowhead whale. New York: Elsevier; 2021. p. 519–35.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  64. Suydam R, George JC, Person BT, Stimmelmayr R, Sformo TL, Pierce L, et al. Subsistence harvest of bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus) by Alaskan Natives during 2018. International Whaling Commission. 2019;SC/68a/AWS:9.

  65. Clarke JT, Brower AA, Ferguson MC, Willoughby AL, Rotrock AD. Distribution and relative abundance of marine mammals in the eastern Chukchi Sea, eastern and western Beaufort Sea, and Amundsen Gulf, 2019 annual report. Seattle: Marine Mammal Laboratory, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, NMFS, NOAA; 2020 p. 628. Report No.: OCS Study BOEM 2020-027.

  66. Smith LC, Stephenson SR. New Trans-Arctic shipping routes navigable by midcentury. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013;110:E1191–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Reeves RR, Ewins PJ, Agbayani S, Heide-Jørgensen MP, Kovacs KM, Lydersen C, et al. Distribution of endemic cetaceans in relation to hydrocarbon development and commercial shipping in a warming Arctic. Mar Policy. 2014;44:375–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Halliday WD, Pine MK, Citta JJ, Harwood L, Hauser DDW, Hilliard RC, et al. Potential exposure of beluga and bowhead whales to underwater noise from ship traffic in the Beaufort and Chukchi Seas. Ocean Coast Manag. 2021;204:105473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Hoag H. Nations agree to ban fishing in Arctic Ocean for at least 16 years. Science. 2017;358(6368):1235. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.358.6368.1235.

  70. Orlov AM, Benzik AN, Vedishcheva EV, Gafitsky SV, Gorbatenko KM, Goryanina SV, et al. Fisheries research in the Chukchi Sea at the RV «Professor Levanidov» in August 2019: some preliminary results. Trudy VNIRO. 2019;178:206–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. George JC, Thewissen JGM, Von Duyke A, Breed GA, Suydam R, Sformo TL, et al. Life history, growth, and form. The bowhead whale. New York: Elsevier; 2021. p. 87–115.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  72. Citta JJ, Suydam RS, Quakenbush LT, Frost KJ, O’Corry-Crowe GM. Dive behavior of eastern Chukchi Beluga Whales (Delphinapterus leucas), 1998–2008. Arctic. 2013;66:389–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the captain and crew of the R/V Norseman II for assistance in deploying and recovering instrumentation and especially R. Woodgate for providing space on the A3 mooring for the hydrophone.

Funding

Funding was provided to KMS by the Russian-American Long-term Census of the Arctic (RUSALCA), funded by the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) (Grant Nos. NA10OAR4320148, AM105, and AM133), and the National Science Foundation (ARC-1107106). The passive acoustic data may be downloaded from arcticdata.io. ARS was supported by a National Science Foundation Office of Polar Programs Postdoctoral Research Fellowship (Award No. 2138801).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ARS: Conceptualization (equal); methodology (lead); investigation (lead); formal analysis (lead); writing—original draft (lead); writing—review and editing (equal); visualization (lead); funding acquisition (equal). KMS: Conceptualization (equal); methodology (supporting); resources (lead); writing—review and editing (equal); supervision (lead); funding acquisition (equal). All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angela R. Szesciorka.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

All authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Supplementary tables with additional information, including migration dates and days absent for each season using different cutoffs; linear regressions between migration dates and days absent with other sea ice area metrics; and cross-correlations among sea ice area metrics.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Szesciorka, A.R., Stafford, K.M. Sea ice directs changes in bowhead whale phenology through the Bering Strait. Mov Ecol 11, 8 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-023-00374-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-023-00374-5

Keywords