Skip to main content

Table 2 Model selection results for caribou resource selection in Noatak National Preserve, Alaska

From: Effects of environmental features and sport hunting on caribou migration in northwestern Alaska

Model

K

ΔAICc

Akaike weight

Log-likelihood

13

16

0.00

0.62

-11721.49

15

17

0.94

0.38

-11720.96

7

15

16.82

0.00

-11730.90

11

16

17.31

0.00

-11730.15

10

15

85.96

0.00

-11765.47

14

16

87.94

0.00

-11765.46

4

14

94.00

0.00

-11770.49

9

15

95.94

0.00

-11770.46

6

9

135.32

0.00

-11796.16

12

10

136.76

0.00

-11795.88

1

8

158.33

0.00

-11808.66

5

9

159.41

0.00

-11808.20

3

8

245.84

0.00

-11852.42

8

9

247.49

0.00

-11852.24

2

8

259.20

0.00

-11859.09

0

0

123552.79

0.00

-73513.89

  1. Candidate models were compared using Akaike’s Information Criterion adjusted for small sample size (AICc). The number of parameters retained for each model (K), difference in AICc values between models (ΔAICc), corresponding Akaike weights, and maximized log-likelihoods of each model are reported here. Model numbers correspond to Table 1