Skip to main content

Table 1 Intrinsic advantages and drawbacks of the four main approaches to study migratory connectivity

From: A synthesis of recent tools and perspectives in migratory connectivity studies

Approach/data

Main advantages

Main drawbacks

Developmentsa

References

A. Bird banding

• Huge datasets

• Inexpensive

• Explicit information of marking origin

• Quantification of links between populations

• Sometimes unknown number of banded birds (MS)

• Survival bias (MS)

• Recapture and recovery spatial and temporal heterogeneity (MS)

• Low probability of recovery

• Advanced models to become quantitative (DC)

MS: Multi-state models

DC: Division coefficient

[34,35,36,37,38]

B. Tracking technologies

• Explicit data on the whole migratory route

• Cost (limited number of tagged individuals)

• Weight (constraints on equippable species, effects on behaviour/survival)

  

> Radio telemetry

• Cheap

• Light (< 1 g)

• Proximity of receiver station needed (RN)

RN: Receiver networks (Motus Wildlife Tracking System)

[24]

> Archival geolocators

• Cheap

• Light (< 2 g)

• Low spatial resolution (TA, SM)

• Recovery needed (survival and recapture bias) (RM)

TA: Technical advances (e.g. light stalks, archival GPS tags)

SM: Spatial models

RM: Recovery models

[12, 41,42,43]

> Satellite transmitters

• High spatial resolution

• No recovery needed

• Most expensive (TA)

• Heaviest (2–100 g) (TA)

TA: Technical advances (e.g. miniaturisation)

[25, 44]

C. Genetics

• Intrinsic marker: allows information on many birds

• Detectable genetic structure needed (dependent on recent evolutionary history) (G)

• Species-specific markers needed (G)

• Low spatial resolution (G)

• Only natal origin

• Cost of genome-wide analyses

• Transit of biological samples for analysis

G: Genomic analysis

[45, 46]

D. Stable isotopes

• Intrinsic marker: allows information on many birds

• Inexpensive

• Universal

• Extensive mapping needed

• Low spatial resolution (MI, PIA, SSM)

• Local variation sometimes higher than regional variation (e.g. elevation effect on precipitation) (SSM)

• Inter-individual variation in discrimination (SSM)

• Transit of biological samples for analysis

MI: Multi-isotope

PIA: Probabilistic isoscape-based assignments

SSM: Site-specific models

[47,48,49]

  1. aMajor developments that have succeeded in mitigating certain limitations of each approach. For details about some less common approaches to track migrants, see Hobson et al. [50]