Skip to main content

Table 1 Simulation findings comparing the azimuthal telemetry model (ATM) with the average of the component-wise azimuth intersections (simple) and Lenth (1981) maximum likelihood estimator (Lenth, sigloc) and M-estimators (Andrews, Huber)

From: Accounting for location uncertainty in azimuthal telemetry data improves ecological inference

  

κ=100

κ=25

  

Simple

sigloc

Lenth

Huber

Andrews

ATM

Simple

sigloc

Lenth

Huber

Andrews

ATM

Encircle design comparison:

nθ=3

\(n_{\hat {\boldsymbol {\mu }}}\)

600

597

600

600

600

600

600

581

598

600

600

600

 

d0.5 (m)

22.4

20.8

20.5

20.4

20.4

21.0

45.3

43.6

42.7

42.8

43.5

42.8

 

Coverage

–

0.430

0.432

0.432

0.433

0.888

–

0.422

0.425

0.423

0.435

0.858

nθ=4

\(n_{\hat {\boldsymbol {\mu }}}\)

600

539

600

600

600

600

600

470

592

595

599

600

 

d0.5 (m)

9.9

9.3

8.7

8.7

8.8

8.7

19.2

19.6

17.5

17.6

17.4

17.5

 

Coverage

–

0.575

0.592

0.585

0.592

0.923

–

0.553

0.542

0.538

0.541

0.917

Random design comparison:

nθ=3

\(n_{\hat {\boldsymbol {\mu }}}\)

600

533

595

593

593

600

600

439

564

561

566

600

 

d0.5 (m)

32.6

32.2

25.1

25.1

25.3

25.0

62.9

75.1

54.2

53.4

53.7

55.6

 

Coverage

–

0.403

0.418

0.417

0.417

0.883

–

0.328

0.348

0.348

0.352

0.850

nθ=4

\(n_{\hat {\boldsymbol {\mu }}}\)

600

454

594

594

598

600

600

367

573

573

579

600

 

d0.5 (m)

14.2

13.0

9.9

10.0

9.9

10.0

25.3

34.0

19.5

19.6

20.0

20.3

 

Coverage

–

0.559

0.581

0.567

0.572

0.920

–

0.526

0.560

0.550

0.556

0.912

Road design comparison:

nθ=3

\(n_{\hat {\boldsymbol {\mu }}}\)

600

499

593

593

597

600

600

409

573

571

576

600

 

d0.5 (m)

56.7

44.4

39.0

39.0

38.5

40.5

95.5

110.4

85.1

84.6

83.9

86.4

 

Coverage

–

0.397

0.418

0.418

0.412

0.877

–

0.296

0.316

0.310

0.312

0.822

nθ=4

\(n_{\hat {\boldsymbol {\mu }}}\)

600

443

600

600

600

600

600

316

592

593

595

600

 

d0.5 (m)

53.8

33.4

26.9

27.7

28.1

26.5

90.3

83.5

54.6

54.8

55.2

55.8

 

Coverage

–

0.580

0.618

0.595

0.588

0.923

–

0.487

0.561

0.543

0.545

0.883

  1. ‘sigloc’ implements Lenth’s maximum likelihood estimator via an alternative algorithm than suggested by Lenth (1981)
  2. Notes: Random, encircle, and road indicate different telemetry study designs. κ is the concentration parameter of the von Mises distribution and controls the amount of azimuthal uncertainty; larger values indicate higher precision. We use κ=100 as moderate uncertainty and a κ=25 for high uncertainty. nθ indicates the number of observer locations used for each spatial animal location. \(n_{\boldsymbol {\hat {\mu }}}\) is the number of animal spatial location estimates that were appropriately estimated; we simulated a total of 600 locations per scenario. d0.5 is the median of the Euclidean distance between the estimated animal location and true location (\(d(\hat {\boldsymbol {\mu }},\boldsymbol {\mu })\)). Coverage is defined as the number of 95% isopleths that contained the true μ out of the total \(n_{\hat {\boldsymbol {\mu }}}\)