Open Access

Towards a conceptual framework for explaining variation in nocturnal departure time of songbird migrants

Movement Ecology20164:24

DOI: 10.1186/s40462-016-0089-2

Received: 15 May 2016

Accepted: 22 September 2016

Published: 17 October 2016

Abstract

Most songbird migrants travel between their breeding areas and wintering grounds by a series of nocturnal flights. The exact nocturnal departure time for these flights varies considerably between individuals even of the same species. Although the basic circannual and circadian rhythms of songbirds, their adaptation to migration, and the factors influencing the birds’ day-to-day departure decision are reasonably well studied, we do not understand how birds time their departures within the night. These decisions are crucial, because the nocturnal departure time defines the potential flight duration of the migratory night. The distances covered during the nocturnal migratory flights in the course of migration in turn directly affect the overall speed of migration. To understand the factors influencing the arrival of the birds in the breeding/wintering areas, we need to investigate the mechanisms that control nocturnal departure time. Here, we provide the first conceptual framework for explaining the variation commonly observed in this migratory trait. The basic schedule of nocturnal departure is likely regulated by both the circannual and circadian rhythms of the innate migration program. We postulate that the endogenously controlled schedule of nocturnal departures is modified by intrinsic and extrinsic factors. So far there is only correlative evidence that birds with a high fuel load or a considerable increase in fuel load and significant wind (flow) assistance towards their migratory goal depart early within the night. In contrast, birds migrating with little fuel and under unfavorable wind conditions show high variation in their nocturnal departure time. The latter may contain an unknown proportion of nocturnal movements not directly related to migratory flights. Excluding such movements is crucial to clearly identify the main drivers of the variation in nocturnal departure time. In general we assume that the observed variation in the nocturnal departure time is explained by individually different reactions norms of the innate migration program to both intrinsic and extrinsic factors.

Keywords

Circannual and circadian rhythms Departure Innate migration program Migration Night Songbird Time

Background

Each year billions of birds migrate between their breeding areas and wintering grounds [1, 2]. The vast majority of these are songbird migrants [1, 3] that follow a stop-and-go migration strategy [4, 5] with replenishing the fuel used during previous flights when stopping over [5, 6]. Most songbird migrants travel exclusively during the night [4, 79], likely because energetic costs [10], water loss [11, 12], and predation risk [13] are reduced in comparison to daytime travels [4, 14].

Migratory movements of nocturnal migrants are usually terminated before sunrise [4, 79], with only some exceptions when crossing ecological barriers [1520]. Provided that these birds usually restrict their migratory activity to the night hours, their departure time within the night defines the potential flight duration, i.e., the potential time spent flying during a migratory flight bout, assuming a termination of flight shortly before sunrise. The flight duration and a bird’s ground speed represent the two core factors determining a bird’s travel speed [21, 22]. Travel speed and total stopover duration together define a bird’s total speed of migration. Variation in total speed of migration in turn affects the timing of the arrival at both the breeding areas and the wintering grounds, which has an effect on reproductive success and survival probability [2326]. Understanding the causes of variation in nocturnal departure time and in nocturnal landing time is therefore important for explaining variation both in total speed of migration and the phenology of birds. In this review we focus on variation in nocturnal departure time, because there is little information available about when songbirds terminate their nocturnal migratory flights.

It has been assumed that nocturnal migrants depart soon after sunset (e.g. [4, 10]). During evening twilight a maximum number of navigational cues become available. Then birds are able to recalibrate their different compass systems, e.g., geomagnetic and celestial compass [27, 28], using the polarization pattern of visible light during twilight [29, 30]. Thus, one would expect a massive exodus of nocturnal migrants in the first two hours of the night as indeed commonly observed in radar studies [9, 3135]. However, using ground surveillance radar the departure behavior of a priori selected individuals cannot be monitored, and the birds’ actual departure from the ground is difficult to detect [36]. Further, the vertical speed of individual birds – providing information about ascending or descending tendencies – is generally balanced after the initial exodus [15]. Thus, quantifying the proportion of individuals starting their nocturnal migratory flights after the exodus by radar is not straightforward and likely to be underestimated in the course of the night. The temporal distribution of nocturnal departures recorded by visual observations during the night, high mist-nets and radio tracking indicates that the timing of nocturnal departures is not exclusively confined to the specific period of 1 to 2 h after sunset [3747], but see [48] (Fig. 1). Although most birds directly observed departing or caught in high mist-nets might have intended to depart from the study site, other nocturnal behaviors cannot be excluded. Recently, several types of nocturnal behavior, apart from real departures in seasonally appropriate directions, have been described including reverse movements, nocturnal explorative flights and landscape-scale stopover movements [43, 49, 50]. Such uncertainties can be minimized by radio-tracking individual birds provided that nocturnal movements on the landscape-scale are not misinterpreted as actual departures for migratory flight [49, 50].
Fig. 1

Variation in the nocturnal departure time of different songbird species as obtained from different radio tracking studies. Bean plots illustrate variation in nocturnal departure timing in relation to sunset (left side) and the proportion of the night (right side). Extension of the bean plots represent kernel density estimations of the distribution of individual departures, given as small lines in the plot. Broad lines represent the median nocturnal departure time of the respective group. Gray bean plots: autumn migration; white bean plots: spring migration. European Robin (Erithacus rubecula) at Rybachy, Russia [39] and Falsterbo, Sweden [46]; Song Thrush (Turdus philomelos) at Falsterbo, Sweden [46]; Swainson’s Thrush (Catharus ustulatus) at Long Point, Ontario, Canada [49, 50]; Eurasian Reed Warbler (Acrocephalus scirpaceus) at Falsterbo, Sweden [37]; Willow Warbler (Phylloscopus trochilus) at Falsterbo, Sweden [46]; Garden Warbler (Sylvia borin) at Falsterbo, Sweden [46]; Black-throated Blue Warbler (Setophaga caerulescens) at Long Point, Ontario, Canada [49, 50]; Northern Wheatears (Oenanthe oenanthe) at Wales, Alaska, USA [44] and on Helgoland, Germany [42, 43]; Sedge Warbler (Acrocephalus schoenobaenus) at Rybachy, Russia [48]

The observed variation in nocturnal departure time raises the question of which proximate causes help to explain the pattern (Fig. 1). Since most nocturnal songbird migrants travel between their breeding areas and wintering grounds without any parental or social guidance, they rely entirely on their innate migration program to reach their migratory goal, at least during their first autumn migration [51]. The innate migration program of these birds includes inherited dispositions for migratory directions, duration of migration, and migratory fueling, which are governed by endogenous rhythms (for reviews see: [5157]). Further, the innate migration program determines how birds react jointly to different intrinsic factors and the currently encountered environment in terms of migratory direction [42, 58, 59], duration of migration, and stopover decisions [6062], reviewed in [57, 63]. The combination of innate rhythms and environmental conditions predetermines the day-to-day departure decisions in migrants along their route and over the season (e.g. [6368]). However, little is known about the cues and underlying mechanisms that shape the variation in nocturnal departure time, i.e. departure decisions on the within-night level.

Here, we aim to review the current knowledge about variation in nocturnal departure time to provide a first conceptual framework of how this trait may be regulated in migratory songbirds (Fig. 2). We postulate that once a bird has decided to resume migration, the nocturnal departure time is endogenously controlled by the underlying innate rhythms of nocturnal activity. We additionally expect that a set of intrinsic and extrinsic factors modify this endogenously controlled basic schedule of nocturnal departure time [42, 45]. The result would be the realized nocturnal departure time, representing the phenotypic response of the individual bird to the experienced conditions (Fig. 2). With this work we summarize previous findings and present a theoretical basis for future investigations on proximate causes and underlying mechanisms of variation in the nocturnal departure time of migratory songbirds.
Fig. 2

Schematic conceptual framework for the regulation of nocturnal departure time in songbird migrants. The innate program provides the circannual, circadian rhythms and spatiotemporal schedule of migration. The photoperiod is used to calibrate or reset the innate migration program. The seasonal variation in birds’ fuel load and the seasonal-specific sequence of molt are regulated among other traits by the innate rhythms (broken arrows). The realized nocturnal departure time represents the interplay of both the intrinsic and extrinsic factors modulating the endogenous stimuli

Endogenous control of nocturnal departure time

The innate migration program of birds comprises both circannual (yearly) and circadian (daily) rhythms acting as biological clocks that provide the underlying temporal basis for migration [54]. The circannual rhythm times the different life history stages (e.g. breeding, molt, migration, wintering) of the annual cycle, including the initiation of migration and the physiological adaptations for migratory fueling (reviewed by [69]). In nocturnal migrants that are usually day-active outside of their migration period (but see [70]) the circannual rhythm is assumed to cause changes in the circadian rhythm which involve the development of nocturnal activity for migration [54]. Both rhythms can run independently of any environmental cues as shown in long-term common-garden experiments (e.g. [54, 71, 72]). However, without any external cues both rhythms fail to exactly track the natural migratory schedule after some time [54].

To investigate the innate migration program and its temporal rhythms, most studies made use of the fact that caged birds in migratory disposition, i.e., during the natural migration periods, show spontaneous seasonal variation in body mass [71, 73] and restless movements consisting of wing whirring and hopping during the night, when they would usually migrate [74, 75]. This nocturnal migratory restlessness (“Zugunruhe”) was shown to be a good general proxy for the migratory behavior that a bird would show in the wild. In naïve birds on their first autumn migration, intensity and duration of nocturnal migratory restlessness throughout the season reflect the inherited migratory distance [71, 72, 76]. In wild songbirds caught on migration, the intensity of nocturnal migratory restlessness predicts the subsequent departure likelihood from a stopover site [77]. Furthermore, the start of nocturnal migratory restlessness of caged songbirds caught on migration is positively correlated with their actual departure time in the following night [78]. Analyzing patterns of nocturnal migratory restlessness therefore represents the key method for studying endogenously controlled migratory behavior in birds, including its variation among different populations and individuals [57].

As the spatiotemporal organization of migration is predetermined by the innate migration program [54, 57], we postulate that the timing of nocturnal departure is likely endogenously controlled as well (Fig. 2). However, so far we lack systematic experiments focusing on this trait in naïve birds. The diel activity patterns of Garden Warblers (Sylvia borin), a long-distance songbird migrant, kept under a naturally changing day-light regime in autumn may suggest an endogenously controlled advancement in the start of nocturnal migratory restlessness with the progress of the migration season [54]. It needs to be considered that the corresponding data were not analyzed in this respect and sample size was low. In the European Quail (Coturnix coturnix coturnix), a nocturnal long-distance migrant among landfowl, individuals from a captive stock that experienced natural day length during spring were consistent in their start of nocturnal migratory restlessness over at least six consecutive nights [79]. A similar consistent pattern was found in a nocturnal songbird migrant, the Common Redstart (Phoenicurus phoenicurus) [80]. Individuals were caught on migration and subsequently kept under constant dim light conditions without access to environmental cues for three consecutive day-and-night cycles. Their nocturnal migratory restlessness consistently started within a narrow time window over the entire trial [80]. This suggests that birds may use their circadian clock to time the initiation of migration within the night. Whether this observed within-individual consistency in the start of nocturnal migratory restlessness is also reflected in the realized nocturnal departure time under free-flying conditions remains unknown. So far, there is only anecdotal evidence from a single Swainson’s Thrush (Catharus ustulata) being radio-tracked for over 1,500 km during seven consecutive nights [81]. On six of the seven nights, nocturnal departure times ranged over a narrow time window, from nine to 13 min after evening civil twilight, i.e, when the sun was at least 6° below the horizon [81].

The basic endogenous schedule of nocturnal departure time is likely to be affected by the birds’ migratory strategy (e.g. short versus long-distance migrants) and their total migration distance. The total migration distance can be regarded as a species- or population-specific trait of the innate migration program, because both the amount and duration of nocturnal migratory restlessness represent the population-specific migration distance [71, 72, 76]. Furthermore, there is a population-specific increase in total speed of migration with total migration distance [16, 8284]. This may suggest that not only the amount and duration of nocturnal migratory restlessness, but also the travel speed, may be endogenously controlled in relation to a bird’s total migration distance. As travel speed is a function of nocturnal departure time (see above), the mechanism driving the population-specific speed of migration might be regulated by a population-specific nocturnal departure time (cf. [44]), if landing times do not vary to the same extent. This is, however, still completely unknown. Correlative support for a population-specific nocturnal departure time has been found in the Northern Wheatear (Oenanthe oenanthe), a long-distance nocturnal songbird migrant of which all populations winter in sub-Sahelian Africa. A comparison between Northern Wheatears breeding in Alaska (USA), northeastern Canada and Europe revealed that there is a positive association between total speed of migration (ranging between 115–200 km/day) and the respective total migration distance (ranging between ca. 4000 – 14500 km) [16, 8285]. Furthermore, the nocturnal departure time advanced towards sunset with an increase in the population-specific total migration distance and the corresponding total speed of migration of the different wheatear populations [44]. Hence, species/populations with a higher speed of migration, related to a longer total migration distance, are likely to depart earlier and/or with less temporal variation in the beginning of the night [44]. Visual observations of departures from the Courish spit (Kaliningrad region, Russia) during five autumn migration seasons support this pattern, as long-distance migrants took off earlier and with less temporal scatter within the night than short-distance migrants [86]. Causal investigations are required to systematically test whether variation in nocturnal departure time can be indeed attributed to total migration distance.

Phenotypic response to intrinsic and extrinsic factors: the realized nocturnal departure time

During migration, many birds encounter a variety of habitats that differ from their natal areas [8789]. This environmental variation may affect a bird’s overall body condition and stopover decisions [68, 89]. The between-individual variation in nocturnal departure time observed under the same set of intrinsic and extrinsic factors is likely explained by the individual differences in their innate migration program yielding individually different phenotypic responses. Between-individual differences in the intrinsic and extrinsic factors additionally contribute to the observed variation in nocturnal departure times [39, 42, 4447] (Fig. 3). Here we review results on the intrinsic and extrinsic factors that are known to influence nocturnal departure time in birds. In addition, the factors that have been shown to affect departure decisions on the day-to-day level [63] are discussed with respect to their potential effect on the nocturnal departure time. We also consider cage studies of individual variation in both the amount and the start of nocturnal migratory restlessness.
Fig. 3

Predictions about the potential effect of different intrinsic and extrinsic factors on nocturnal departure time of songbird migrants. Predicted effects on mean nocturnal departure time (solid and dashed line) and its variation (shaded light gray) refer to factors in the respective boxes (solid and dashed fringe)

Intrinsic factors

Fuel load

In addition to its effects on decisions on the day-to-day level [63, 90], fuel load also influences within-night departure decisions. Individuals with a high fuel load depart earlier within the night and with less temporal variation than individuals with a lower fuel load [42, 45, 46], but see [3941]. Birds with high fuel loads, enabling a night-long flight towards their migratory goal, are thought to use the entire night for flying. They likely decide within a short time period after sunset to resume migration [42]. In contrast, birds with low fuel loads – having still decided to leave the current stopover site – could depart any time of night, possibly travelling shorter distances to nearby stopover sites that are potentially more favorable for refueling [49, 50]. We argue that “lean” birds continuously decide when to leave the current site during the course of a night. Such behavior would explain the high variation in their nocturnal departure time. For these birds a late departure may be advantageous, as it could ensure arrival at the next stopover site with some safety margin of fuel [41, 48]. Further, decisions for late departures may be driven by the advantage of early morning arrivals that allow visual selection of suitable stopover sites. Both would help to minimize the risk of starvation during migration.

Most published studies that focus on the effect of fuel load on nocturnal departure times are based on between-individual (cross-sectional) correlations [42, 4547]. Since the individual change in fuel load over a bird’s stopover duration is positively correlated with the concurrent change in nocturnal migratory restlessness [91], and since an individual increase in restlessness is equivalent to an individually higher departure probability [77], we stress that the within-individual variation in fuel load is one important factor predicting individual nocturnal departure time. However, detecting within-individual variation in fuel load and nocturnal departure time is notoriously difficult in field studies. Avoiding these difficulties by temporarily caging migrating Northern Wheatears demonstrated a strong negative within-individual effect of fuel stores on the start of migratory restlessness, indicating that an increase in individual fuel stores induced an advanced start of nocturnal migratory restlessness on the level of the individual [92]. As the latter is a reliable approximation for the nocturnal departure time [78], the individual change in fuel load is likely an important intrinsic factor shaping individual variation in nocturnal departure time (Fig. 3). Information about the current fuel load and its changes during a bird’s stopover will be incorporated in the expression of innate migratory rhythms (Fig. 2) and the resulting behavioral response, i.e., departure decisions on the day-to-day level and during the night.

Molt, health, sex, and age

There are other intrinsic factors, like molt, health, sex, and age, influencing departure decisions on the day-to-day level and the general movement ecology of migrants (e.g. [63, 9395]). Although these have not been related to nocturnal departure time, we briefly discuss their potential influence here.

Molt is an energy and time demanding process in the annual cycle of birds [96]. As molt also compromises the flight ability [9799] and likely increases predation risk [100], most birds molt in the breeding areas and/or on the wintering grounds prior to migration or suspend the molt during migration [101105]. Migrating during molt or with suspended molt increases flight costs [9799] and thereby decreases travel speed. Birds either set off early in the night to compensate for the low travel speed, or they time their nocturnal departure irrespective of molt status but reduce the intended travel distance per night. Thus, the potential effect of active or suspended molt on the variation of nocturnal departure time remains ambiguous.

Infections, diseases, and parasites can seriously affect the health of birds, and consequently their migratory performance [106]. A poor overall body condition as a result of a poor health status likely increases the variation in the timing of nocturnal departure, because sick birds may have to allocate energy for stimulating their immune system [106, 107] at the cost of fuel deposition for migratory flights.

Sex is an important intrinsic factor influencing the phenology of most migratory birds [108110]. In spring, males typically arrive at the breeding area and at stopovers earlier than females [26, 85, 111114]. In addition to the sex-specific initiation of spring migration at the wintering grounds, there is evidence for a higher speed of migration in males than in females [85]. Higher migration speed in males may be realized either by shorter stopover durations, increased airspeed or more time spent flying during each migratory flight bout. The latter can be accomplished by an earlier or less variable nocturnal departure time in males. If so, we predict that the sex-specific differences in nocturnal departure time may be related to sex-specific differences in their travel speed. Yet, we lack any evidence for such a sex-specific difference in nocturnal departure time.

The age of a migratory bird affects the initiation of migration [115], the selection of the route [64, 115117], and the selectivity with regard to favorable wind conditions for departure [93]. In general, young individuals show more variation in migratory traits than old birds [93, 116, 117], although there is no clear pattern in respect of the nocturnal departure time [45]. However, potential age effects are difficult to assess, since they can be attributed either to learning [116, 117] or to selective disappearance reducing genetic and phenotypic variation in older age classes [118]. Longitudinal data, i.e., tracking the time when individuals resume migration within the night over many years, are required to correctly assess the effect of age on nocturnal departure time.

Extrinsic factors

Remaining migration distance and progress of the season

The remaining migration distance to the seasonally appropriate migratory goal is subject to a continuous change along the migration route. A migrant’s general stopover ecology is modulated by the individual’s position [119121] and the time within the season [64]. This demonstrates the capability of birds to estimate their relative whereabouts along the migration route (reviewed in [122]). Simulating a geomagnetic displacement in a “common-garden experiment” showed that Northern Wheatears adjusted their amount of nocturnal migratory restlessness in relation to the simulated remaining migration distance [121]. Whether the nocturnal departure time is also affected by the remaining migration distance remains unknown. In spring, individuals that have a long remaining migration distance and/or that are late in the migratory season are thought to increase their fitness by minimizing the remaining time required to reach the breeding area still within the reproductive time window [110]. By departing closer to sunset, individuals can maximize their potential nocturnal flight duration and thereby advance their arrival in the breeding area. Given this, we predict that birds with longer remaining migration distances should depart earlier in the night and/or show less temporal variation than those with shorter remaining migration distances (Fig. 3). Furthermore, individuals migrating late in the season may also show earlier nocturnal departure times so as to increase their migration speed relative to individuals of the same population migrating early in the season (Fig. 3).

Length of night

For nocturnal migrants, the length of the night (being inextricably linked with time within season) generally predetermines the potential maximum flight duration for a migratory flight bout, although birds may prolong their flights into the day when crossing ecological barriers [9, 15, 1720]. It has therefore been hypothesized that with a decrease in night length, nocturnal departure time is more concentrated shortly after sunset [37, 39] (Fig. 3). As a consequence, the predicted patterns are opposite for spring and autumn (Fig. 3). A telemetry study with European Robins passing the Courish spit (Kaliningrad region, Russia) revealed a seasonal difference in the median nocturnal departure time which was related to seasonal differences in night length [39]. However, environmental conditions [123] and the main endogenous drivers for an early nocturnal departure likely also differ between seasons (cf. [71, 124]) and so may explain the observed seasonal differences.

Weather

Weather variables, such as wind, air pressure, cloud cover, precipitation, and air temperature, have been shown to strongly influence the departure behavior of birds [22, 63]. Favorable wind conditions increase the departure probability from a stopover site, whereas birds prolong their stopover under unfavorable wind conditions (e.g. [22, 50, 65, 125129]). Likewise, correlative evidence suggests that birds advance their nocturnal departures towards sunset to maximize the potential flight duration under favorable and/or improving wind assistance [42, 130] (Fig. 3). Wind is the result of differences in air pressure. Therefore, a change in air pressure is usually predictive of the upcoming wind conditions. Birds are able to detect changes in air pressure [131, 132]. Migrants may use this cue for their departure decisions [22, 133, 134]. Based on a study with European Robins it has been suggested that a change in air pressure may also affect the exact timing of nocturnal departures [41]. Birds experiencing a drop in air pressure during the day were found to set off late at night [41]. In general, it seems that favorable winds and rising air pressure promote early nocturnal departure times. However, the effect of deteriorating wind conditions (i.e., headwinds) on nocturnal departure time is difficult to predict and likely depends on the magnitude and direction of the alternation.

The effect of cloud cover on nocturnal departure time has mainly been considered in relation to the visibility of celestial cues [37, 3941]. Species that use a celestial compass (e.g. [135, 136]) may delay their nocturnal departure under an overcast sky until stars become visible. Such a behavioral response was observed in European Reed Warblers (Acrocephalus scirpaceus) [37], but not in European Robins [3941]. It remains therefore unclear whether or not cloud cover itself has a significant impact on nocturnal departure time. Alternatively, the probability of precipitation related to the magnitude of cloud cover may affect the birds’ departure decision [127, 137], because rain represents a severe hazard during flight [138]. Yet, no study could demonstrate that a high probability of precipitation affects the nocturnal departure time of birds.

With a drop in air temperature both the day-to-day departure probability from stopover sites [44, 83] and the amount of nocturnal migratory restlessness [139, 140], indicative for the departure probability of birds [77], have been shown to increase. Such a reaction is regarded as an energy-saving strategy to minimize the costs of thermoregulation [141], as the energy expenditure of birds decreases with increasing temperature [141, 142]. For the same reasons we hypothesize that birds time their nocturnal departure closer to sunset when experiencing cold conditions on the ground for the same reasons as outlined above (Fig. 3). The effect may be more pronounced during the autumn migration season, when warmer conditions are expected towards the seasonally appropriate migratory direction, than in spring.

Food availability, competition, and predation risk

Other factors such as food availability, inter-/intra-specific competition and predation risk have been shown to influence a bird’s day-to-day departure decisions [63, 143]. These three factors characterize the quality of the current stopover site which in turn affects a bird’s fueling rate and the resulting departure fuel load (e.g. [144146]). Hence, we assume that they may act on the nocturnal departure time via their effect on the bird’s fuel load.

Social stimulation

Many bird species utter specific calls during flight, especially during the migratory periods. These flight calls are assumed to help birds keeping contact in loose flocks during nocturnal migration [147]. Furthermore, these calls seem to stimulate migratory behavior of conspecifics, as indicated by a study on captive Bobolinks (Dolichonyx oryzivorus) [148]. In this study, birds responded to flight calls of conspecifics by an immediate increase in their nocturnal activity in the cage, if they had shown nocturnal migratory restlessness before. If they had been inactive during the previous night, flight calls induced only a weak activity response [148]. This might indicate that migratory songbirds, which are ready for a nocturnal flight bout, can get stimulated to depart by social stimuli like the flight calls of their conspecifics. Whether flight calls affect the actual departure times of migrants at night remains ambiguous.

Ecological barriers

On their migratory journeys, most long-distance songbird migrants will have to negotiate species-specific adverse habitats for resting and refueling to reach their respective breeding areas or wintering grounds. At the extreme, these habitats may offer limited or even no opportunity for landing and feeding, as do large water bodies (oceans or large lakes) and deserts for migratory land birds. The crossing of such ecological barriers requires sufficient fuel and the ability to select for favorable weather conditions [42, 63, 71, 128, 129, 137, 149, 150]. Hence, migrants that encounter an ecological barrier need to jointly integrate intrinsic (fuel load) and extrinsic factors (wind, precipitation, air pressure) for their departure decision [42], as a mistake may have lethal consequences for the individual. If birds carry insufficient fuel and/or encounter unfavorable weather conditions for such a crossing, they may either prolong their stopover in wait for better conditions [66], perform reverse migration in search of a more suitable stopover site [42, 45, 151155] or circumnavigate the barrier by a detour [156]. These behaviors are usually observed in rather lean individuals and the timing of departure ranges over the whole night [42, 45, 47]. In contrast, migrants with sufficient fuel loads for the crossing and experiencing favorable weather time their departures early within the night with only little temporal variation [42, 45, 46]. In doing so, these birds maximize the night time available for flying across the barrier and thereby minimize their exposure to the disadvantages of daytime flights, i.e., more turbulent air [10] and higher predation risk [13].

Conclusions

Our concept suggests that the basic schedule of nocturnal departures is regulated by the circannual and circadian rhythms of the innate migration program. The sum of intrinsic factors cumulatively describes a bird’s current overall body condition, i.e., its general readiness for a migratory flight. This readiness together with the environmental conditions described by the extrinsic factors is likely fed back to the innate migration program and thus, both modulate jointly the endogenously controlled nocturnal departure time (Fig. 2). The observed realized nocturnal departure time of an individual bird is the result of this process.

Variation in nocturnal departure time is likely explained by individual differences in the innate migration program and the individually different phenotypic reaction norms to both the intrinsic and extrinsic factors. At present, it seems that the individual change in fuel load and the individually experienced wind conditions are the main drivers for the variation in nocturnal departure time. Potential effects of other weather parameters are difficult to assess, as they are all highly correlated with each other. Thus, there is a severe statistical issue, in terms of multicollinearity [157]. There is further a biological issue, as it remains difficult to distinguish whether individual birds respond to one or more weather parameters at the same time in correlative studies [89].

Given that the start of nocturnal migratory restlessness is positively correlated with the nocturnal departure time, allows the identification of factors causing individual variation in the former trait and transferring these results to nocturnal departure times [78]. This provides the potential to investigate causal relationships and easily separate between within- and between-individual variations in future experimental studies [92].

Under free-flying conditions, nocturnal movements not related to departures for migratory flights add an unknown amount of variation to our estimates of the nocturnal departure time. Ideally, these can be disregarded. Stopover sites in front of an ecological barrier allow distinguishing between departures for migratory flights and non-migratory movements. However, the crossing of an ecological barrier constitutes a special case, as the barrier itself is an environmental factor of major significance. Results from these sites may not be directly transferable to the nocturnal departure behavior of birds migrating across benign landscapes. New technical developments for tracking small songbirds on a broad landscape scale [158] or even globally [3, 159] will help to disentangle the different types of migratory and non-migratory nocturnal movements. This will significantly improve our understanding of the timing of nocturnal departures.

Technical improvements and miniaturization of accelerometers implemented in small tracking devices [160] will further enable studying individual departure and landing times in migratory birds simultaneously. The resulting actual migratory flight durations and the corresponding distances covered will detail the between and within-individual variation in migration strategies, which may extend our understanding of the flexibility of migratory behavior substantially.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all staff, volunteers and students working at the different bird observatories, like the island station of the Institute of Avian Research “Vogelwarte Helgoland”, Long Point Bird Observatory (especially Annika Samuelsen and Bethany Thurber), Falsterbo Bird Observatory and the Biological Station Rybachy, that hosted and supported many previous studies on nocturnal departures of migratory birds. AT acknowledges support from the Zoological Institute RAS (research project No 01201351182). Further, we would like to thank Franz Bairlein and three anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on the manuscript.

Funding

FM and HS are funded by three grants of the German Research Foundation to HS (SCHM 2647). SS and RM are funded by grants of the Swedish Research Council VR to RM (2011–4765, 2015–04869) and a Linnaeus grant (no. 349-2007-8690) from the Swedish Research Council and Lund University to the Centre of Animal Movement Research. AT is financially supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (grant 16-04-01773).

Authors’ contribution

HS conceived the study. FM and HS wrote the manuscript. PT, SS, RM, SAM and HS provided data. All authors gave important feedback on the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Avian Research “Vogelwarte Helgoland”
(2)
Department of Biology, Acadia University
(3)
Bird Studies Canada
(4)
Department of Biology, Lund University
(5)
Biological Station Rybachy, Zoological Institute RAS

References

  1. Hahn S, Bauer S, Liechti F. The natural link between Europe and Africa - 2.1 billion birds on migration. Oikos. 2009;118(4):624–26.Google Scholar
  2. Moreau RE. The Palaearctic-African Bird Migration Systems. London and New York: Academic; 1972.Google Scholar
  3. Bridge ES, Thorup K, Bowlin MS, Chilson PB, Diehl RH, Fléron RW, Hartl P, Kays R, Kelly JF, Robinson WD, et al. Technology on the move: Recent and forthcoming innovations for tracking migratory birds. Bioscience. 2011;61:689–98.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Alerstam T. Bird Migration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990.Google Scholar
  5. Åkesson S, Hedenström A. How migrants get there: migratory performance and orientation. Bioscience. 2007;57(2):123–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Delingat J, Dierschke V, Schmaljohann H, Mendel B, Bairlein F. Daily stopovers as optimal migration strategy in a long-distance migrating passerine: the Northern Wheatear. Ardea. 2006;94(3):593–605.Google Scholar
  7. Berthold P. Bird migration: A general survey. Secondth ed. Oxford New York: Oxford University Press; 2001.Google Scholar
  8. Dorka V. Das jahres- und tageszeitliche Zugmuster von Kurz- und Langstreckenziehern nach Beobachtungen auf den Alpenpässen Cou/Bretolet (Wallis). Ornithol Beob. 1966;63:165–223.Google Scholar
  9. Schmaljohann H, Liechti F, Bruderer B. Songbird migration across the Sahara – the non-stop hypothesis rejected! Proc R Soc Lond B. 2007;274:735–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Kerlinger P, Moore FR. Atmospheric structure and avian migration. In: Power DM, editor. Current Ornithology. 6th ed. New York: Plenum Press; 1989. p. 109–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Schmaljohann H, Bruderer B, Liechti F. Sustained bird flights occur at temperatures beyond expected limits of water loss rates. Anim Behav. 2008;76:1133–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Gerson AR, Guglielmo CG. Flight at low ambient humidity increases protein catabolism in migratory birds. Science. 2011;333:1434–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Walter H. Elenora's Falcon. Adaptations to prey and habitat in a social raptor. Chicago: University of Chicago; 1979.Google Scholar
  14. Alerstam T. Flight by night or day? Optimaldaily timing of bird migration. J Theor Biol. 2009;258:530–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Schmaljohann H, Liechti F, Bruderer B. Daytime passerine migrants over the Sahara – are these diurnal migrants or prolonged flights of nocturnal migrants? In: Craig A, editor. Ostrich, Proc Pan African Ornithol Congress, Djerba, vol. 78. 2007. p. 357–62.Google Scholar
  16. Bairlein F, Norris DR, Nagel R, Bulte M, Voigt CC, Fox JW, Hussell DJT, Schmaljohann H. Cross-hemisphere migration of a 25-gram songbird. Biol Lett. 2012;8:505–7.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Adamík P, Emmenegger T, Briedis M, Gustafsson L, Henshaw I, Krist M, Laaksonen T, Liechti F, Procházka P, Salewski V, et al. Barrier crossing in small avian migrants: individual tracking reveals prolonged nocturnal flights into the day as a common migratory strategy. Sci Rep. 2016;6:21560.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Ouwehand J, Both C. Alternate non-stop migration strategies of pied flycatchers to cross the Sahara desert. Biol Lett. 2016;12:20151060.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. DeLuca WV, Woodworth BK, Rimmer CC, Marra PP, Taylor PD, McFarland KP, Mackenzie SA, Norris DR. Transoceanic migration by a 12 g songbird. Biol Lett. 2015;11:20141045.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Grattarola A, Spina F, Pilastro A. Spring migration of the Garden Warbler (Sylvia borin) across the Mediterranean Sea. J Ornithol. 1999;140(4):419–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Nilsson C, Klaassen RHG, Alerstam T. Differences in speed and duration of bird migration between spring and autumn. Am Nat. 2013;181(6):837–45.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Liechti F. Birds: blowin' by the wind? J Ornithol. 2006;147(2):202–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Norris DR, Marra PP, Kyser TK, Sherry TW, Ratcliffe LM. Tropical winter habitat limits reproductive success on the temperate breeding grounds in a migratory bird. Proc R Soc Lond B. 2004;271:59–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Smith RJ, Moore FR. Arrival timing and seasonal reproductive performance in a longdistance migratory landbird. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2005;5:231–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Reudink MW, Marra PP, Kyser TK, Boag PT, Langin KM, Ratcliffe LM. Non-breeding season events influence sexual selection in a long-distance migratory bird. Proc R Soc Lond B. 2009;276:1619–26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Møller AP. Phenotype-dependent arrival time and its consequences in a migratory bird. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 1994;35:115–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Cochran WW, Mouritsen H, Wikelski M. Migrating songbirds recalibrate their magnetic compass daily from twilight cues. Science. 2004;304:405–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Muheim R, Moore FR, Phillips JB. Calibration of magnetic and celestial compass cues in migratory birds - a review of cue-conflict experiments. J Exp Biol. 2006;209:2–17.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Muheim R, Phillips JB, Åkesson S. Polarized light cues underlie compass calibration in migratory songbirds. Science. 2006;313:837–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Sjöberg S, Muheim R. A New View on an Old Debate: Type of Cue-Conflict Manipulation and Availability of Stars Can Explain the Discrepancies between Cue-Calibration Experiments with Migratory Songbirds. Front Behav Neurosci. 2016;10:29.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Bruderer B. Radar studies on nocturnal bird migration in the Negev. Ostrich. 1994;65:204–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Bruderer B. The study of bird migration by radar. Part 2: Major achievements. Naturwissenschaften. 1997;84:45–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Dokter AM, Liechti F, Stark H, Delobbe L, Tabary P, Holleman I. Bird migration flight altitudes studied by a network of operational weather radars. J R Soc Interface. 2011;8:30–43.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Gauthreaux Jr SA. A radar and direct visual study of Passerine spring migration in Southern Louisiana. Auk. 1971;88:343–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Dokter AM, Åkesson S, Beekhuis H, Bouten W, Buurma L, van Gasteren H, Holleman I. Twilight ascents by common swifts, Apus apus, at dawn and dusk: acquisition of orientation cues? Anim Behav. 2013;85:545–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Bruderer B. The study of bird migration by radar. Part 1: The technical basis. Naturwissenschaften. 1997;84:1–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Åkesson S, Walinder G, Karlsson L, Ehnbom S. Reed warbler orientation: initiation of nocturnal migratory flights in relation to visibility of celestial cues at dusk. Anim Behav. 2001;61(1):181–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Bolshakov CV, Bulyuk VN, Chernetsov N. Spring nocturnal migration of Reed Warblers Acrocephalus scirpaceus: departure, landing and body condition. Ibis. 2003;145:106–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Bolshakov CV, Chernetsov N, Mukhin A, Bulyuk V, Kosarev VV, Ktitorov P, Leoke D, Tsvey A. Time of nocturnal departures in European robins, Erithacus rubecula, in relation to celestial cues, season, stopover duration and fat score. Anim Behav. 2007;74:855–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Bulyuk VN, Tsvey A. Timing of nocturnal autumn migratory departures in juvenile European robins (Erithacus rubecula) and endogenous and external factors. J Ornithol. 2006;147(2):298–309.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Bulyuk VN. Influence of fuel load and weather on timing of nocturnal spring migratory departures in European robins, Erithacus rubecula. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2012;66:385–95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Schmaljohann H, Naef-Daenzer B. Body condition and wind support initiate shift in migratory direction and timing of nocturnal departure in a free flying songbird. J Anim Ecol. 2011;80:1115–22.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Schmaljohann H, Becker PJJ, Karaardic H, Liechti F, Naef-Daenzer B, Grande C. Nocturnal exploratory flights, departure time, and direction in a migratory songbird. J Ornithol. 2011;152:439–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Schmaljohann H, Korner-Nievergelt F, Naef-Daenzer B, Nagel R, Maggini I, Bulte M, Bairlein F. Stopover optimization in a long-distance migrant: the role of fuel load and nocturnal take-off time in Alaskan northern wheatears (Oenanthe oenanthe). Front Zool. 2013;10:26.Google Scholar
  45. Smolinsky JA, Diehl RH, Radzio TA, Delaney DK, Moore FR. Factors influencing the movement biology of migrant songbirds confronted with an ecological barrier. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2013;67:2041–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Sjöberg S, Alerstam T, Åkesson S, Schulz A, Weidauer A, Coppack T, Muheim R. Weather and fuel reserves determine departure and flight decisions in passerines migrating across the Baltic Sea. Anim Behav. 2015;104:59–68.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Moore FR, Aborn DA. Time of departure by Summer Tanagers (Piranga rubra) from a stopover site following spring trans-gulf migration. Auk. 1996;113:949–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Bolshakov CV, Chernetsov N. Initiation of nocturnal flight in two species of long-distance migrants (Ficedula hypoleuca and Acrocephalus schoenobaenus) in spring: a telemetry study. Avian Ecol Behav. 2004;12:63–76.Google Scholar
  49. Taylor PD, Mackenzie SA, Thurber BG, Calvert AM, Mills AM, McGuire LP, Guglielmo CG. Landscape movements of migratory birds and bats reveal an expanded scale of stopover. PLoS One. 2011;6:e27054.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Mills AM, Thurber BG, Mackenzie SA, Taylor PD. Passerines use Nocturnal Flights for Landscape-Scale Movements during Migration Stopover. Condor. 2011;113(3):597–607.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Berthold P. Control of bird migration. 1st ed. London: Chapman & Hall; 1996.Google Scholar
  52. Gwinner E. Endogene Jahresrythmen beim Vogelzug. Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 1986;Juni:76–86.Google Scholar
  53. Gwinner E. Circannual rhythms in bird migration: Control of temporal patterns and interactions with photoperiods. In: Gwinner E, editor. Bird migration. Physiology and ecophysiology. Berlin: Springer; 1990. p. 257–68.Google Scholar
  54. Gwinner E. Circadian and circannual programmes in avian migration. J Exp Biol. 1996;199:39–48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Gwinner E. Circannual rhythms. Endogenous annual clocks in the organizations of seasonal processes. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer; 2009.Google Scholar
  56. Bairlein F, Gwinner E. Nutritional mechanisms and temporal control of migratory energy accumulation in birds. Annu Rev Nutr. 1994;14:187–215.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Bairlein F, Eikenaar C, Schmaljohann H. Routes to genes: unravelling the control of avian migration—an integrated approach using Northern Wheatear Oenanthe oenanthe as model organism. J Ornithol. 2015;156:S3–S14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Liechti F, Komenda-Zehnder S, Bruderer B. Orientation of passerine trans-Sahara migrants: the directional shift ('Zugknick') reconsidered for free-flying birds. Anim Behav. 2012;83:63–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Fortin D, Liechti F, Bruderer B. Variation in the nocturnal flight behaviour of migratory birds along the northwest coast of the Mediterranean Sea. Ibis. 1999;141:480–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Schaub M, Jenni L. Stopover durations of three warbler species along their autumn migration route. Oecologia. 2001;128:217–27.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Schaub M, Jenni L. Variation of fuelling rates among sites, days and individuals in migrating passerine birds. Funct Ecol. 2001;15:584–94.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Schaub M, Jenni L. Fuel deposition of three passerine bird species along the migration route. Oecologia. 2000;122:306–17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Jenni L, Schaub M. Behavioural and Physiological Reactions to Environmental Variation in Bird Migration: a review. In: Berthold P, Gwinner E, Sonnenschein E, editors. Avian Migration. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2003. p. 155–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Brown JM, Taylor PD. Adult and hatch-year blackpoll warblers exhibit radically different regional-scale movements during post-fledging dispersal. Biol Lett. 2015. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2015.0593.
  65. Smith AD, McWilliams SR. What to do when stopping over: behavioral decisions of a migrating songbird during stopover are dictated by initial change in their body condition and mediated by key environmental conditions. Behav Ecol. 2014;25:1423–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Deppe JL, Ward MP, Bolus RT, Diehl RH, Celis-Murillo A, Zenzal TJ, Moore FR, Benson TJ, Smolinsky JA, Schofield LN, et al. Fat, weather, and date affect migratory songbirds’ departure decisions, routes, and time it takes to cross the Gulf of Mexico. PNAS. 2015;112(46):E6331–E6338.Google Scholar
  67. Eikenaar C, Fritzsch A, Kämpfer S, Schmaljohann H. Migratory restlessness increases and refuelling rate decreases over the spring migration season in northern wheatears. Anim Behav. 2016;112:75–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Cohen EB, Moore FR, Fischer RA. Experimental evidence for the interplay of exogenous and endogenous factors on the movement ecology of a migrating songbird. PLoS One. 2012;7:e41818.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Wingfield JC. Organization of vertebrate annual cycles: implications for control mechanisms. Philos Trans R Soc B. 2008;363:425–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Lesku JA, Rattenborg NC, Valcu M, Vyssotski AL, Kuhn S, Kuemmeth F, DHeidrich W, Kempenaers B. Adaptive sleep loss in polygynous Pectoral Sandpipers. Science. 2012;337:1654–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Maggini I, Bairlein F. Endogenous Rhythms of Seasonal Migratory Body Mass Changes and Nocturnal Restlessness in Different Populations of Northern Wheatear Oenanthe oenanthe. J Biol Rhythms. 2010;25:268–76.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Bulte M, Bairlein F. Endogenous control of migratory behaivor in Alaskan Northern Wheatears Oenanthe oenanthe. J Ornithol. 2013;154:567–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Gwinner E. Circannual clocks in avian reproduction and migration. Ibis. 1996;138:47–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Berthold P, Fiedler W, Querner U. Die Zugunruhe bei Vögeln - eine Darstellung nach Videoaufnahmen bei Infrarotlichtbeleuchtung. J Ornithol. 2000;141(3):285–99.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Muheim R, Henshaw I, Sjöberg S, Deutschlander ME. BirdOriTrack: A new video-tracking program for orientation research with migratory birds. J Field Ornithol. 2014;85:91–105.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. Berthold P, Querner U. Genetic basis of migratory behavior in European warblers. Science. 1981;212:77–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  77. Eikenaar C, Klinner T, Szostek KL, Bairlein F. Migratory restlessness in captive individuals predicts actual departure in the wild. Biol Lett. 2014. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2014.0154.
  78. Schmaljohann H, Kämpfer S, Fritzsch A, Kima R, Eikenaar C. Start of nocturnal migratory restlessness in captive birds predicts nocturnal departure time in free-flying birds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2015;69:909–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  79. Bertin A, Houdelier C, Richard-Yris M-A, Guyomarc'h C, Lumineau S. Stable individual profiles of daily timing of migratory restlessness in European Quail. Chronobiol Int. 2007;24(2):253–67.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  80. Coppack T, Becker SF, Becker PJJ. Circadian flight schedules in night-migrating birds caught on migration. Biol Lett. 2008;4:619–22.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  81. Cochran WW. Orientation and other migratory behaviours of a Swainson's Trush followed for 1500 km. Anim Behav. 1987;35:927–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  82. Arlt D, Olsson P, Fox JW, Low M, Pärt T. Prolonged stopover duration characterises migration strategy and constraints of a long-distance migrant songbird. Anim Migr. 2015;2:47–62.Google Scholar
  83. Schmaljohann H, Fox JW, Bairlein F. Phenotypic response to environmental cues, orientation and migration costs in songbirds flying halfway around the world. Anim Behav. 2012;84:623–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  84. Schmaljohann H, Buchmann M, Fox JW, Bairlein F. Tracking migration routes and the annual cycle of a trans-Sahara songbird migrant. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2012;66:915–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  85. Schmaljohann H, Meier C, Arlt D, Bairlein F, van Oosten HH, Morbey YE, Åkesson S, Buchmann M, Chernetsov N, Desaever R, et al. Proximate causes of avian protandry differ between subspecies with contrasting migration challenges. Behav Ecol. 2015;27(1):321–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  86. Bolshakov CV, Bulyuk VN. New comprehensive systematic data concerning the time of nocturnal departure in some passerine migrants in autumn. Ring. 2001;23:131–7.Google Scholar
  87. Jenni-Eiermann S, Almasi B, Maggini I, Salewski V, Bruderer B, Liechti F, Jenni L. Numbers, foraging and refuelling of passerine migrants at a stopover site in the western Sahara: diverse strategies to cross a desert. J Ornithol. 2011;152:S113–28.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  88. Bibby CJ, Green RE. Autumn migration strategies of Reed and Sedge Warblers. Ornis Scand. 1981;12:1–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  89. Winkler DW, Jørgensen C, Both C, Houston AI, McNamara JM, Levey DJ, Partecke J, Fudickar A, Kacelnik A, Roshier D, Piersma T. Cues, strategies, and outcomes: how migrating vertebrates track environmental change. Mov Ecol. 2014;2:10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  90. Goymann W, Spina F, Ferri A, Fusani L. Body fat influences departure from stopover sites in migratory birds: evidence from whole island telemetry. Biol Lett. 2010;6:478–81.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  91. Eikenaar C, Schläfke L. Size and accumulation of fuel reserves at stopover predict nocturnal restlessness in a migratory bird. Biol Lett. 2013. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2013.0712.
  92. Eikenaar C, Müller F, Kämpfer S, Schmaljohann H. Fuel accumulation advances nocturnal departure: A migratory restlessness study on northern wheatears at stopover. Anim Behav. 2016;117:9–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  93. Mitchell GW, Woodworth BK, Taylor PD, Norris DR. Automated telemetry reveals age specific differences in flight duration and speed are driven by wind conditions in a migratory songbird. Mov Ecol. 2015;3:19.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  94. Ellegren H. Stopover ecology of autumn migrating Bluethroats Luscinia s. svecica in relation to age and sex. Ornis Scand. 1991;22:340–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  95. Rayner JM, Swaddle JP. Aerodynamics and behaviour of moult and take-off in birds. In: Domenici P, Blake RW, editors. Biomechanics in animal behaviour. Oxford: BIOS Scientific Publishers Ltd; 2000. p. 125–57.Google Scholar
  96. Lindström Å, Visser GH, Daan S. The Energetic Cost of Feather Synthesis Is Proportional to Basal Metabolic Rate. Physiol Zool. 1993;66(4):490–510.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  97. Hedenström A. Aerodynamics of moult in birds: Effects of wing gaps on flight performance. In: Adams NJ, Slotow RH, editors. Proc 22 Int Ornithol Congr. Johannesburg: BirdLife South Africa; 1999. p. 536–43.Google Scholar
  98. Hedenström A, Sunada S. On the aerodynamics of moult gaps in birds. J Exp Biol. 1999;202:67–76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Swaddle JP, Witter MS. The effect of molt on the flight performance, body mass, and behavior of European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris): an experimental approach. Can J Zool. 1997;75:1135–46.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  100. Hedenström A. Adaptations to migration in birds: behavioural strategies, morphology and scaling effects. Philos Trans R Soc B. 2008;363:287–99.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  101. Hall KSS, Fransson T. Lesser Whitethroats under time-constraint moult more rapidly and grow shorter wing feathers. J Avian Biol. 2000;31:583–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  102. Mead CJ, Watmough BR. Suspended Moult of Trans-Saharan Migrants in Iberia. Bird Study. 1976;23(3):187–96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  103. Swann RL, Baillie SR. The suspension of moult by trans-Saharan migrants in Crete. Bird Study. 1979;26(1):55–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  104. Hedenström A, Lindström A, Pettersson J. Interrupted moult of adult willow warblers Phylloscopus trochilus during autumn migration through Sweden. Ornis Svecica. 1995;5:69–74.Google Scholar
  105. Barta Z, McNamara JM, Houston AI, Weber TP, Hedenström A, Feró O. Optimal moult strategies in migratory birds. Philos Trans R Soc B. 2008;363:211–29.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  106. van Gills JA, Munster VJ, Radersma R, Liefhebber D, Fouchier RAM, Klaassen M. Hampered Foraging and Migratory Performance in Swans Infected with Low-Pathogenic Avian Influenza A Virus. PLoS One. 2007;2(1):e184.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  107. Viney ME, Riley EM, Buchanan KL. Optimal immune responses: immunocompetence revisited. Trends Ecol Evol. 2005;20(12):665–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  108. Morbey YE, Coppack TC, Pulido F. Adaptive hypotheses for protandry in arrival to breeding areas: a review of models and empirical tests. J Ornithol. 2012;S153:205–15.Google Scholar
  109. Morbey YE, Ydenberg RC. Protandrous arrival timing to breeding areas: a review. Ecol Lett. 2001;4:663–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  110. Kokko H. Competition for early arrival in birds. J Anim Ecol. 1999;68:940–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  111. Rubolini D, Spina F, Saino N. Protandry and sexual dimorphism in trans-Saharan migratory birds. Behav Ecol. 2004;15:592–601.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  112. Tøttrup AP, Thorup K. Sex-differentiated migration patterns, protandry and phenology in North European songbird populations. J Ornithol. 2008;149:161–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  113. Coppack T, Pulido F. Proximate control and adaptive potential of protandrous migration in birds. Integr Comp Biol. 2009;49:493–506.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  114. Saino N, Rubolini D, Serra L, Caprioli M, Morganti M, Ambrosini R, Spina F. Sex-related variation in migration phenology in relation to sexual dimorphism: a test of competing hypotheses for the evolution of protandry. J Evol Biol. 2010;23:2054–65.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  115. Crysler ZJ, Ronconi RA, Taylor PD. Differential fall migratory routes of adult and juvenile Ipswich Sparrows (Passerculus sandwichensis princeps). Mov Ecol. 2016. doi:10.1186/s40462-016-0067-8.
  116. Hake M, Kjellen N, Alerstam T. Age-dependent migration strategy in honey buzzards Pernis apivorus tracked by satellite. Oikos. 2003;103:385–96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  117. Sergio F, Tanferna A, De Stephanis R, Jiménez LJ, Blas J, Tavecchia G, Preatoni D, Hiraldo F. Individual improvements and selective mortality shape lifelong migratory performance. Nature. 2014;515:410–3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  118. van de Pol M, Verhulst S. Age-dependent traits: a new statistical model to separate within- and between- individual effects. Am Nat. 2006;167:766–73.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  119. Fransson T, Jakobsson S, Johansson P, Kullberg C, Lind J, Vallin A. Magnetic cues trigger extensive refuelling. Nature. 2001;414:35–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  120. Boström JE, Fransson T, Henshaw I, Jacobson S, Kullberg C, Åkesson S. Autumn migratory fuelling: a response to simulated magnetic displacements in juvenile wheatears. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2010;64:1725–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  121. Bulte M. Endogenous control of migratory behavior in Northern Wheatears Oenanthe oenanthe, PhD Thesis. Oldenburg: University of Oldenburg; 2013.Google Scholar
  122. Wiltschko R, Wiltschko W. Avian Navigation. Auk. 2009;126:717–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  123. Bauchinger U, Klaassen RHG. Longer days in spring than in autumn accelerate migration speed of passerine birds. J Avian Biol. 2005;36:3–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  124. Eikenaar C, Schmaljohann H. Wind conditions experienced during the day predict nocturnal restlessness in a migratory songbird. Ibis. 2015;157:125–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  125. Åkesson S, Hedenström A. Wind selectivity of migratory flight departures in birds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2000;47:140–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  126. Erni B, Liechti F, Underhill LG, Bruderer B. Wind and rain govern the intensity of nocturnal bird migration in central Europe - a log-linear regression analysis. Ardea. 2002;90(1):155–66.Google Scholar
  127. Schaub M, Liechti F, Jenni L. Departure of migrating European robins, Erithacus rubecula, from a stopover site in relation to wind and rain. Anim Behav. 2004;67:229–37.Google Scholar
  128. Delingat J, Bairlein F, Hedenström A. Obligatory barrier crossing and adaptive fuel management in migratory birds: the case of the Atlantic crossing in Northern Wheatears (Oenanthe oenanthe). Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2008;62:1069–78.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  129. Dossman BC, Mitchell GW, Norris DR, Taylor PD, Guglielmo CG, Matthews SN, Rodewald PG. The effects of wind and fuel stores on stopover departure behavior across a migratory barrier. Behav Ecol. 2016;27(2):567–74.Google Scholar
  130. Sjöberg S. Stopover behaviour in migratory songbirds: timing, orientation and departures, PhD Thesis. Lund: Lund University; 2015.Google Scholar
  131. Stolt B-O. Temperature and air pressure experiments on activity of passerine birds with notes on seasonal and circadian rhythms. Zool Bidrag Uppsala. 1969;38:175–231.Google Scholar
  132. Kreithen ML, Keeton WT. Detection of changes in atmospheric pressure by the homing pigeon, Columbia livia. J Comp Physiol A. 1974;89:73–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  133. Richardson WJ. Timing and amount of bird migration in relation to weather: a review. Oikos. 1978;30:224–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  134. Richardson WJ. Timing of bird migration in relation to weather: updated review. In: Gwinner E, editor. Bird migration. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 1990. p. 78–101.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  135. Emlen ST. The stellar-orientation system of a migratory bird. Sci Am. 1975;233:102–11.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  136. Emlen ST. Migration: orientation and navigation. In: Farner DS, editor. Avian biology. 5th ed. New York: Academic; 1975. p. 129–219.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  137. Dierschke V, Delingat J. Stopover behaviour and departure decision of northern wheatears, Oenanthe oenanthe, facing different onward non-stop flight distances. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2001;50:535–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  138. Newton I. Weather-related mass-mortality events in migrants. Ibis. 2007;149:453–67.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  139. Singh J, Budki P, Rani S, Kumar V. Temperature alters the photoperiodically controlled phenologies linked with migration and reproduction in a night-migratory songbird. Proc R Soc Lond B. 2011. doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.1062.
  140. Metcalfe J, Schmidt KL, Bezner Kerr W, Guglielmo CG, MacDougall-Shackleton SA. White-throated sparrows adjust behaviour in response to manipulations of barometric pressure and temperature. Anim Behav. 2013;86:1285–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  141. Wikelski M, Tarlow EM, Raim A, Diehl RH, Larkin RP, Visser GH. Costs of migration in free-flying songbirds. Nature. 2003;423:704.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  142. Maggini I, Bairlein F. Metabolic response to changes in temperature in northern wheatears from an arctic and a temperate populations. J Avian Biol. 2013;44:1–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  143. Alerstam T. Optimal bird migration revisited. J Ornithol. 2011;152:5–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  144. Ktitorov P, Bairlein F, Dubinin M. The importance of landscape context for songbirds on migration: body mass gain is related to habitat cover. Landsc Ecol. 2008;23:107–15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  145. Chernetsov N. Habitat selection by nocturnal passerine migrants en route: mechanisms and results. J Ornithol. 2006;147:185–91.Google Scholar
  146. Lindström A. Fuel deposition rates in migrating birds: Causes, constraints and consequences. In: Berthold P, Gwinner E, Sonnenschein E, editors. Avian Migration. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer; 2003. p. 307–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  147. Farnsworth A. Flight calls and their value for future ornithological studies and conservation research. Auk. 2005;122:733–46.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  148. Hamilton III WJ. Evidence concerning the function of nocturnal call notes of migratory birds. Condor. 1962;64:390–401.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  149. Rubolini D, Pastor AG, Pilastro A, Spina F. Ecological barriers shaping fuel stores in barn swallows Hirundo rustica following the central and western Mediterranean flyways. J Avian Biol. 2002;33:15–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  150. Bairlein F. How do migratory songbirds cross the Sahara? Trends Ecol Evol. 1988;3:191–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  151. Komenda-Zehnder S, Liechti F, Bruderer B. Is reverse migration a common feature of nocturnal bird migration? - an analysis of radar data from Israel. Ardea. 2002;90(2):325–34.Google Scholar
  152. Nilsson C, Sjöberg S. Causes and characteristics of reverse bird migration: an analysis based on radar, radio tracking and ringing at Falsterbo, Sweden. J Avian Biol. 2016;47(3):354–62.Google Scholar
  153. Åkesson S, Walinder G, Karlsson L, Ehnbom S. Nocturnal migratory flight initiation in reed warblers Acrocephalus scirpaceus: effect of wind on orientation and timing of migration. J Avian Biol. 2002;33:349–57.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  154. Sandberg R, Moore FR. Migratory orientation of red-eyed vireos, Vireo olivaceus, in relation to energetic condition and ecological context. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 1996;39:1–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  155. Zehnder S, Åkesson S, Liechti F, Bruderer B. Observation of free-flying nocturnal migrants at Falsterbo: occurrence of reverse flight directions in autumn. Avian Science. 2002;2(2):103–13.Google Scholar
  156. Alerstam T. Detours in Bird Migration. J Theor Biol. 2001;209:319–31.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  157. Zuur AE, Irwin DE, Elphick CS. A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical probelms. Methods Ecol Evol. 2010;1:3–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  158. Motus Wildlife Tracking System. [http://www.motus-wts.org]. Accessed 25 Sept 2016.
  159. Wikelski M, Kays RW, Kasdin NJ, Thorup K, Smith JA, Swenson Jr GW. Going wild: what a global small-animal tracking system could do for experimental biologists. J Exp Biol. 2007;210:181–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  160. Bäckman J, Andersson A, Alerstam T, Pedersen L, Sjöberg S, Thorup K, Tøttrup AP. Activity and migratory flights of individual free-flying songbirds throughout the annual cycle: method and first case study. J Avian Biol. 2016;47:001–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016