Skip to main content

Table 1 Overview of logger types (company, weight and presence of light stalk) and mean weight of logger birds and non-logger birds in the years 2012–2019

From: No “carry-over” effects of tracking devices on return rate and parameters determining reproductive success in once and repeatedly tagged common swifts (Apus apus), a long-distance migratory bird

Year

Logger type

Company

Logger weight including body harness [g]

Light stalk

Mean weight of logger birds [g]

Mean weight of non-logger birds [g]

2012

MK5540

Lotek (former Biotrack Ltd), Wareham, UK

0.68

No

40.1 ± 2.7

44.4 ± 2.3

2013

ML6590

Lotek (former Biotrack Ltd), Wareham, UK

0.79

No

45.9 ± 2.9

40.8 ± 3.6

2014

SOI-GDL

small

Swiss Ornithological Institute, Sempach, CH

0.64

Yes

46.2 ± 1.9

44.2 ± 2.6

2015

SOI-GDL2

Swiss Ornithological Institute, Sempach, CH

0.73

Yes

44.6 ± 3.4

39.6 ± 2.5

2016

SOI-GDL

PAM

Swiss Ornithological Institute, Sempach, CH

1.72

Yes

43.6 ± 4.4

41.9 ± 6.2

2017

SOI-GDL3_

PAM

Swiss Ornithological Institute, Sempach, CH

1.60

No

40.9 ± 2.7

42.5 ± 2.8

2018

SOI-GDL

PAM &

nanoFixTMGEO-Mini

Swiss Ornithological Institute, Sempach, CH & PathTrack Ltd, Otley, UK

1.48 & 1.30

No

45.2 ± 3.6

40.5 ± 3.7

2019

nanoFixTMGEO-Mini

PathTrack Ltd, Otley, UK

1.30

No

44.8 ± 2.5

42.0 ± 4.7