Skip to main content

Table 3 Candidate generalized linear mixed models analysing the effect of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on the home range size (K95) in female houbara bustards (n = 21)

From: Factors modulating home range and resource use: a case study with Canarian houbara bustards

 

AIC

ΔAIC

Wi

Explained deviance

df

RS + P + DM + BS + BW + HQ

569.96

 

0.233

32.14

11

RS + P + DF + BS + BW + HQ

569.99

0.03

0.230

32.16

11

RS + P + DF + DM + BS + BW + HQ

570.77

0.81

0.156

32.64

12

S + RS + P + DM + BS + BW + HQ

570.97

1.01

0.141

32.54

12

S + RS + P + DF + BS + BW + HQ

571.71

1.75

0.097

32.27

12

S + RS + P + DF + DM + BS + BW + HQ

572.14

2.18

0.079

32.90

13

RS + DF + BS + BW + HQ

573.65

3.69

0.037

29.87

10

S + P + DF + BS + BW + HQ

574.33

4.37

0.026

27.76

8

  1. We analysed the effect of season (S), reproductive status (RS), precipitation (P), density of females (DF), density of males (DM), body size (BS), body weight (BW), and habitat quality (HQ). Summary statistics include Akaike information criterion (AIC), difference in AIC (ΔAIC), Akaike weight (Wi), deviance explained and degrees of freedom (df). Models are ranked from best to worst according to AIC
Back to article page

Movement Ecology

ISSN: 2051-3933