Table 5 Evaluating the effect of sex, site, and year on the differences in core range sizes on the best performing model of Table 4
Model | Variables | AICc | K | dAICc | AICc weights |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M_Site_1 | (Intercept) + lsi_ag + dcad_natveg + regionBago + regionTanintharyi | 229.98 | 5 | 0.00 | 0.85 |
M_Sex_Site | (Intercept) + lsi_ag + dcad_natveg + Sexmale + regionBago + regionTanintharyi | 234.16 | 6 | 4.18 | 0.11 |
M_Site_2 | (Intercept) + lsi_ag + dcad_natveg + dcore_mn_natveg + para_mn_natveg + regionBago + regionTanintharyi | 237.14 | 7 | 7.16 | 0.02 |
M_Sex | (Intercept) + lsi_ag + dcad_natveg + dcore_mn_natveg + para_mn_natveg + Sexmale | 238.53 | 6 | 8.54 | 0.01 |
M_Ag_Nv_2 | (Intercept) + lsi_ag + dcad_natveg + dcore_mn_natveg + para_mn_natveg | 238.98 | 5 | 9.00 | 0.01 |
M_year | (Intercept) + lsi_ag + dcad_natveg + dcore_mn_natveg + para_mn_natveg + season2017_2018 + season2018_2019 + season2019_2020 | 251.77 | 8 | 21.79 | 0 |