Skip to main content

Table 3 Significant main effects (above) and interaction terms (below) driving the statistical power in habitat selection studies

From: Analysis of local habitat selection and large-scale attraction/avoidance based on animal tracking data: is there a single best method?

Parameter name Estimate SE p
Hab_auto -0.02669 0.00537 <0.0001
Hab_anis -0.85126 0.29533 0.00395
Hab_type -1.27360 0.16523 <0.0001
σSD -0.28153 0.03195 <0.0001
σω 3.07303 0.31267 <0.0001
Meth_iSSM 0.41505 0.05467 <0.0001
Hab_type:Meth_iSSM 0.69831 0.11372 <0.0001
  1. Results are based on GEE analyses in combination with LASSO-based model selection. Only iSSM and ST-PPM methods were considered because all the other methods showed inflated type I error rates