Skip to main content

Table 3 Significant main effects (above) and interaction terms (below) driving the statistical power in habitat selection studies

From: Analysis of local habitat selection and large-scale attraction/avoidance based on animal tracking data: is there a single best method?

Parameter name

Estimate

SE

p

Hab_auto

-0.02669

0.00537

<0.0001

Hab_anis

-0.85126

0.29533

0.00395

Hab_type

-1.27360

0.16523

<0.0001

σSD

-0.28153

0.03195

<0.0001

σω

3.07303

0.31267

<0.0001

Meth_iSSM

0.41505

0.05467

<0.0001

Hab_type:Meth_iSSM

0.69831

0.11372

<0.0001

  1. Results are based on GEE analyses in combination with LASSO-based model selection. Only iSSM and ST-PPM methods were considered because all the other methods showed inflated type I error rates
Back to article page

Movement Ecology

ISSN: 2051-3933