Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of PII classification of non-feeding (directed or searching) and feeding/cache sites with field verifications of those activities for five of six cougars described in Table 1

From: Quantifying animal movement for caching foragers: the path identification index (PII) and cougars, Puma concolor

 

Correct

Incorrect

Total

AS02

Non feeding

2

0

2

Cache

20

4

24

Total

22

4

26

 

85%

  

C07

Non feeding

26

0

26

Cache

17

10

27

Total

43

10

53

 

81%

  

AS07

Non feeding

3

0

3

Cache

13

3

16

Total

16

3

19

 

84%

  

C04

Non feeding

22

0

22

Cache

26

4

30

Total

48

4

52

 

92%

  

P26

Non feeding

7

2

9

Cache

40

18

58

Total

47

20

67

 

70%

  

All

Non feeding

60

2

62

Cache

116

39

155

Total

176

41

217

 

81%

  
  1. Movements classified as non-feeding were considered correct if site investigations found no prey remains or signs of scavenging, and were considered incorrect if any of those evidences were present. Cache site classifications were considered correct if prey remains were found or evidence that the prey item had been scavenged, and as incorrect if no prey remains were found