The ecological determinants of baboon troop movements at local and continental scales

Table 1 Ecological data for the 23 baboon populations used in the DPL continental comparison model

Species & study site	Latitude	Longitude	Altitude	#Study troops	#Primate Spp.	Anthropogenic influence? ¹	References ²
Papio anubis
Bole, Ethiopia	9.42	38.00	1700	1	4	No	[80]
Budongo, Uganda	1.93	31.67	700	1	7	No	[113]
Chololo, Kenya	0.40	36.95	1660	1	2	No	[79]
Gashaka Gumti, Nigeria	7.51	11.61	320	2	9	Yes (1/2)	[114]
Gilgil, Kenya	−0.49	36.32	1770	1	1	No	[12]
Ishasha, Uganda	−0.62	29.66	950	1	4	No	[115]
Metahara, Ethiopia	8.91	39.93	950	1	2	No	[116]
Mulu, Ethiopia	9.30	40.83	1275	1	2	No	(Dunbar, unpublished)
Papio cynocephalus
Amboseli, Kenya	−2.64	37.25	1130	6	3	Yes (1/6)	[17,33,117]
Mikumi, Tanzania	−7.09	37.42	550	1	5	No	[77]
Tana, Kenya	−1.93	40.14	30	1	6	No	[118]
Issa, Tanzania*	−5.51	30.56	1600	2	6	No	This study
Papio hamadryas
Awash, Ethiopia	8.84	40.01	950	5	2	No	[43,45,119]
Erer-Gota, Ethiopia	9.56	41.38	1200	1	1	No	[120]
Papio papio
Mt. Assirik, Senegal	12.87	−12.80	150	2	6	No	[38]
Papio ursinus
Blouberg, SA	−23.03	29.06	900	1	3	No	(Noser, unpublished)
Cape Point, SA	−34.27	18.43	50	10	1	Yes (7/10)	[13,39,121]
Drakensberg, SA	−29.47	29.26	2250	2	1	No	[41,122]
Honnet, SA	−22.63	30.18	310	2	2	Yes (1/2)	[61]
Mkuzi, SA	−27.60	32.05	125	1	2	No	[42] from [123]
Suikersbosrand, SA	−26.50	28.22	1600	1	2	No	[124]
Tsaobis, Namibia	−22.55	15.73	1000	1	1	No	[44]
DeHoop, SA	−34.43	20.57	10	2	1	No	(Hill, unpublished)
Mt. Zebra, SA	−32.20	25.39	1500	1	1	No	[125] from [123]

¹Indicates whether baboons studied experience anthropogenic influences, and if so, how many troops. ²Unpublished data are acquired from authors listed.

ISSN: 2051-3933