Table 1 Model selection results for the candidate set of models investigating the effect of covariates on area-under-the-curve for 8 estimators of home range for Florida Panther from 2005 to 2013 in Southern Florida, USA
From: Is there a single best estimator? Selection of home range estimators using area-under-the-curve
Model terms | K | AIC c | ∆AIC c | Weights |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Estimator + (1| animal) | 10 | 786.06 | 0.00 | 1.0 |
Estimator + Percent fix success + GPS schedule + Number of locations + Study Area + (1| animal) | 22 | 807.98 | 21.92 | 0.00 |
Intercept | 3 | 1098.29 | 312.23 | 0.00 |
GPS schedule + (1| animal) | 5 | 1103.15 | 317.09 | 0.00 |
Percent fix success + (1| animal) | 5 | 1104.77 | 318.70 | 0.00 |
Number of locations + (1| animal) | 6 | 1105.93 | 319.86 | 0.00 |
Percent fix success + GPS schedule + (1| animal) | 7 | 1107.46 | 321.39 | 0.00 |
GPS schedule + Number of locations + (1| animal) | 8 | 1111.06 | 324.99 | 0.00 |
Study Area + (1| animal) | 8 | 1111.12 | 325.06 | 0.00 |
Percent fix success + GPS schedule + Number of locations + (1| animal) | 10 | 1115.40 | 329.33 | 0.00 |
Number of locations + Study Area + (1| animal) | 11 | 1118.28 | 332.21 | 0.00 |
Number of locations + GPS schedule + Study Area + (1| animal) | 13 | 1122.14 | 336.07 | 0.00 |